Objectives Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) mainly affects small joints. Despite the mechanical function of joints, the role of mechanical stress in the development of arthritis is insufficiently... Show moreObjectives Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) mainly affects small joints. Despite the mechanical function of joints, the role of mechanical stress in the development of arthritis is insufficiently understood. We hypothesised that mechanical stress/physical strain is a risk factor for joint inflammation in RA. Therefore, we studied work-related physical strain in subjects with clinically suspected arthralgia (CSA) as a risk factor for the presence of imaging-detected subclinical joint inflammation and the development of clinical arthritis/RA. Methods In 501 CSA patients and 155 symptom-free persons’ occupation-related physical strain was quantified using the International Standard Classification of Occupations. Contrastenhanced hand-MRIs were made and evaluated for joint inflammation (sum of synovitis/tenosynovitis/osteitis). CSA patients were followed on RA development. Age relationship was studied using an interaction term of physical strain with age. Results The degree of physical strain in CSA is associated with the severity of joint inflammation, independent of educational-level/BMI/smoking (interaction physical strain-age p=0.007; indicating a stronger association with increasing age). Physical strain is associated with higher tenosynovitis scores, in particular. In symptom-free persons, physical strain was not associated with imaging-detected joint inflammation. Higher degrees of physical strain also associated with higher risks for RA development in an age-dependent manner (HR=1.20 (1.06–1.37)/10-year increase in age), independent of educational-level/BMI/smoking. This association was partly mediated by an effect via subclinical joint inflammation. Conclusions Work-related physical strain increases the risk of subclinical joint inflammation and of developing RA. The age relationship suggests an effect of long-term stress or that tenosynovium is more sensitive to stress at older age. Together, the data indicate that mechanical stress contributes to the development of arthritis in RA. Show less
BackgroundObese RA patients have higher disease activity scores (DAS). Previous research showed that obese RA patients have higher tender joint count (TJC) and VAS general health. However, it... Show moreBackgroundObese RA patients have higher disease activity scores (DAS). Previous research showed that obese RA patients have higher tender joint count (TJC) and VAS general health. However, it remains unclear whether DAS components measuring local and systemic inflammation (swollen joint count (SJC), CRP) are increased and if this is present in the total RA population or confined to an ACPA subgroup. As ACPA is suggested to enhance inflammatory responses, we hypothesized that the association of obesity with SJC and CRP is present especially in ACPA-positive RA. We therefore studied associations of obesity with courses of DAS components in ACPA subgroups.MethodsWe studied 649 RA patients (291 ACPA-positive), included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic. Five-year courses of DAS44 and DAS44 components (SJC-44, TJC-53, CRP, VAS (0-100)) were compared between RA patients with normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), and obesity (>= 30.0), stratified for ACPA. Linear/Poisson mixed models with a knot at 4 months were used.ResultsObese RA patients had + 0.32 higher DAS compared to normal weight during the 5-year follow-up. In ACPA-positive RA, obese patients had + 0.43 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.64) higher DAS, whereas in ACPA-negative RA, this difference was smaller and not statistically significant: + 0.19 (95% CI: - 0.01, 0.38). In ACPA-positive RA, all DAS components were significantly higher in obese patients compared to normal weight: SJC + 60% (IRR1.60; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.16), CRP + 3.7 mg/L (95% CI:0.95, 6.53), TJC + 55% (IRR1.55; 95% CI:1.15, 2.10), and VAS + 9 (95% CI: 4.0, 14.2). ACPA-negative obese RA patients tended to have higher TJC (IRR1.22; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.55) and VAS (beta 4.3; 95% CI: - 0.4, 9.0), while SJC (IRR1.07; 95% CI:0.85, 1.33) and CRP (beta 0.24; 95% CI: - 1.29, 3.32) were unaffected.ConclusionThe association of obesity with a worse DAS course is mainly present in ACPA-positive RA; especially SJC and CRP levels remain higher in ACPA-positive RA patients with obesity but not ACPA-negative RA patients. This is the first demonstration that obesity influences the disease course of ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA differently. Show less
Hollander, N.K. den; Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. van der; Steenbergen, H.W. van 2023
ObjectiveObesity conveys a risk for RA development, while paradoxically, associating with less radiographic progression after RA diagnosis. Using MRI we can study this surprising association in... Show moreObjectiveObesity conveys a risk for RA development, while paradoxically, associating with less radiographic progression after RA diagnosis. Using MRI we can study this surprising association in detail from MRI-detected synovitis and osteitis to MRI-detected erosive progression, which precedes radiographic progression. Previous research suggested obesity associates with less osteitis and synovitis. We therefore aimed to (i) validate the previously suggested association between BMI and MRI-detected osteitis/synovitis; (ii) study whether this is specific for ACPA-positive or ACPA-negative RA or also present in other arthritides; (iii) study whether MRI-detected osteitis associates with MRI-detected erosive progression; and (iv) study whether obesity associates with MRI-detected erosive progression.MethodsWe studied 1029 early arthritis patients (454 RA, 575 other arthritides), consecutively included in Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic. At baseline patients underwent hand-and-foot MRI that were RAMRIS-scored, and 149 RA patients underwent follow-up MRIs. We studied associations between baseline BMI and MRI-detected osteitis/synovitis (using linear regression), and erosive progression (using Poisson mixed models).ResultsIn RA, higher BMI associated with less osteitis at disease onset (β = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.96) but not with synovitis. Higher BMI associated with less osteitis in ACPA-positive RA (β = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.97), ACPA-negative RA (β = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95, 0.99) and other arthritides (β = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.99). Over 2 years, overweight and obesity associated with less MRI-detected erosive progression (P = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). Osteitis also associated with erosive progression over 2 years (P < 0.001).ConclusionsHigh BMI relates to less osteitis at disease onset, which is not confined to RA. Within RA, high BMI and less osteitis associated with less MRI-detected erosive progression. This suggests that the protective effect of obesity on radiographic progression is exerted via a path of less osteitis and subsequently fewer MRI-detected erosions. Show less
Hollander, N.K. den; Verstappen, M.; Huizinga, T.W.J.; Helm-van Mil, A. van der 2022
Objectives: Identifying patients that will develop RA among those presenting with undifferentiated arthritis (UA) remains a clinical dilemma. Although MRI is helpful according to EULAR... Show moreObjectives: Identifying patients that will develop RA among those presenting with undifferentiated arthritis (UA) remains a clinical dilemma. Although MRI is helpful according to EULAR recommendations, this has only been determined in UA patients not fulfilling 1987 RA criteria, while some of these patients are currently considered as RA because they fulfil the 2010 criteria. Therefore, we studied the predictive value of MRI for progression to RA in the current UA population, i.e. not fulfilling RA classification criteria (either 1987 or 2010 criteria) and not having an alternate diagnosis. Additionally, the value of MRI was studied in patients with a clinical diagnosis of UA, regardless of the classification criteria. Methods: Two UA populations were studied: criteria-based UA as described above (n = 405) and expert-opinion-based UA (n = 564), i.e. UA indicated by treating rheumatologists. These patients were retrieved from a large cohort of consecutively included early arthritis patients that underwent contrast-enhanced MRI scans of hand and foot at baseline. MRIs were scored for osteitis, synovitis and tenosynovitis. Patients were followed for RA development during the course of 1 year. Test characteristics of MRI were determined separately for subgroups based on joint involvement and autoantibody status. Results: Among criteria-based UA patients (n = 405), 21% developed RA. MRI-detected synovitis and MRI-detected tenosynovitis were predictive for progression to RA. MRI-detected tenosynovitis was independently associated with RA progression (odds ratio (OR) 2.79; 95% CI 1.40, 5.58), especially within ACPA-negative UA patients (OR 2.91; 95% CI 1.42, 5.96). Prior risks of RA development for UA patients with mono-, oligo- and polyarthritis were 3%, 19% and 46%, respectively. MRI results changed this risk most within the oligoarthritis subgroup: positive predictive value was 27% and negative predictive value 93%. Similar results were found in expert-opinion-based UA (n = 564). Conclusion: This large cohort study showed that MRI is most valuable in ACPA-negative UA patients with oligoarthritis; a negative MRI could aid in preventing overtreatment. Show less
