Background: Little is known about costs and effects of vision screening strategies to detect amblyopia. Aim of this study was to compare costs and effects of conventional (optotype) vision... Show moreBackground: Little is known about costs and effects of vision screening strategies to detect amblyopia. Aim of this study was to compare costs and effects of conventional (optotype) vision screening, photoscreening or a combination in children aged 3-6 years. Methods: Population-based, cross-sectional study in preventive child health care in The Hague. Children aged 3 years (3y), 3 years and 9 months (3y9m) or 5-6 years (5/6y) received the conventional chart vision screening and a test with a photoscreener (Plusoptix 512C). Costs were based on test duration and additional costs for devices and diagnostic work-up. Results: Two thousand, one hundred and forty-four children were included. The estimated costs per child screened were (sic)17.44, (sic)20.37 and (sic)6.90 for conventional vision screening at 3y, 3y9m and 5/6y, respectively. For photoscreening, these estimates were (sic)6.61, (sic)7.52 and (sic)9.40 and for photoscreening followed by vision screening if the result was unclear (combination) (sic)9.32 (3y) and (sic)9.33 (3y9m). The number of children detected with amblyopia by age were 9, 14 and 5 (conventional screening), 6, 13 and 3 (photoscreening) and 10 (3y) and 15 (3y9m) (combination), respectively. The estimated costs per child diagnosed with amblyopia were (sic)1500, (sic)1050 and (sic)860 for conventional vision screening, (sic)860, (sic)420 and (sic)1940 for photoscreensic)ing and (sic)730 (3y) and (sic)450 (3y9m) for the combination. Conclusions: Combining photoscreening with vision screening seems promising to detect amblyopia in children aged 3y/3y9m, whereas conventional screening seems preferable at 5/6y. As the number of study children with amblyopia is small, further research on the effects of these screening alternatives in detecting children with amblyopia is recommended. Show less
