To examine the function of the central pseudoknot in 16S rRNA, we have studied Escherichia coli 30S subunits with the A(18) mutation in this structure element, Previously, this mutation, which... Show moreTo examine the function of the central pseudoknot in 16S rRNA, we have studied Escherichia coli 30S subunits with the A(18) mutation in this structure element, Previously, this mutation, which changes the central base pair of helix 2, C-18-G(917) to an A(18)xG(917) mismatch, was shown to inhibit translation in vivo and a defect in initiation was suggested, Here, we find that the mutant 30S particles are impaired in forming 70S tight couples and predominantly accumulate as free 30S subunits, Formation of a 30S initiation complex, as measured by toeprinting, was almost as efficient for mutant 30S subunits, derived from the tight couple fraction, as for the wild-type control, However, the A(18) mutation has a profound effect on the overall stability of the subunit, The mutant ribosomes were inactivated by affinity chromatography and high salt treatment, due to easy loss of ribosomal proteins, Accordingly, the particles could be reactivated by partial in vitro reconstitution with 30S ribosomal proteins, Mutant 30S subunits from the free subunit fraction were already inactive upon isolation, but could also be reactivated by reconstitution, Apparently, the inactivity in initiation of these mutant 30S subunits is, at least in part, also due to the lack of essential ribosomal proteins, We conclude that disruption of helix 2 of the central pseudoknot by itself does not affect the formation of a 30S initiation complex, We suggest that the in vivo translational defect of the mutant ribosomes is caused by their inability to form 70S initiation complexes. Show less
