Leiden University Scholarly Publications

Ramaekers, M.J.F.G.; Westenberg, J.J.M.; Venner, M.F.G.H.M.; Juffermans, J.F.; Assen, H.C. van; Kiefte, B.J.C. te; ... ; Schalla, S. (2023)

Evaluating a phase-specific approach to aortic flow: a 4D flow MRI study

Article / Letter to editor

Background: Aortic flow parameters can be quantified using 4D flow MRI. However, data are sparse on how different methods of analysis influence these parameters and how these parameters evolve during systole.Purpose: To assess multiphase segmentations and multiphase quantification of flow-related parameters in aortic 4D flow MRI.Study Type: Prospective.Population: 40 healthy volunteers (50% male, 28.9 +/- 5.0 years) and 10 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm (80% male, 54 +/- 8 years).Field Strength/Sequence: 4D flow MRI with a velocity encoded turbo field echo sequence at 3 T.Assessment: Phase-specific segmentations were obtained for the aortic root and the ascending aorta. The whole aorta was segmented in peak systole. In all aortic segments, time to peak (TTP; for flow velocity, vorticity, helicity, kinetic energy, and viscous energy loss) and peak and time-averaged values (for velocity and vorticity) were calculated.Statistical Tests: Static vs. phase-specific models were...Show moreBackground: Aortic flow parameters can be quantified using 4D flow MRI. However, data are sparse on how different methods of analysis influence these parameters and how these parameters evolve during systole.Purpose: To assess multiphase segmentations and multiphase quantification of flow-related parameters in aortic 4D flow MRI.Study Type: Prospective.Population: 40 healthy volunteers (50% male, 28.9 +/- 5.0 years) and 10 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm (80% male, 54 +/- 8 years).Field Strength/Sequence: 4D flow MRI with a velocity encoded turbo field echo sequence at 3 T.Assessment: Phase-specific segmentations were obtained for the aortic root and the ascending aorta. The whole aorta was segmented in peak systole. In all aortic segments, time to peak (TTP; for flow velocity, vorticity, helicity, kinetic energy, and viscous energy loss) and peak and time-averaged values (for velocity and vorticity) were calculated.Statistical Tests: Static vs. phase-specific models were assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Other analyses were performed using phase-specific segmentations for aortic root and ascending aorta. TTP for all parameters was compared to TTP of flow rate using paired t-tests. Time-averaged and peak values were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: In the combined group, velocity in static vs. phase-specific segmentations differed by 0.8 cm/sec for the aortic root, and 0.1 cm/sec (P = 0.214) for the ascending aorta. Vorticity differed by 167 sec(-1) mL(-1) (P = 0.468) for the aortic root, and by 59 sec(-1) mL(-1) (P = 0.481) for the ascending aorta. Vorticity, helicity, and energy loss in the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta peaked significantly later than flow rate. Time-averaged velocity and vorticity values correlated significantly in all segments.Data Conclusion: Static 4D flow MRI segmentation yields comparable results as multiphase segmentation for flow-related parameters, eliminating the need for time-consuming multiple segmentations. However, multiphase quantification is necessary for assessing peak values of aortic flow-related parameters.Show less

4D flow MRI

aorta

MRI

blood flow

All authors

Ramaekers, M.J.F.G.; Westenberg, J.J.M.; Venner, M.F.G.H.M.; Juffermans, J.F.; Assen, H.C. van; Kiefte, B.J.C. te; Adriaans, B.P.; Lamb, H.J.; Wildberger, J.E.; Schalla, S.

Date

2023-06-13

Journal

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volume

59

Issue

3

Pages

1056 - 1067

DOI

doi:10.1002/jmri.28852

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.28852