In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
Multicenter Stratified Comparison of Hospital Costs Between Laparoscopic and Open Colorectal Cancer Resection: Influence of Tumor Location and Operative Risk
Objective: To compare actual 90-day hospital costs between elective open
and laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer resection in a daily practice multicenter
setting stratified for operative risk.
Background: Laparoscopic resection has developed as a commonly accepted
surgical procedure for colorectal cancer. There are conflicting data on the
influence of laparoscopy on hospital costs, without separate analyses based on
Show moreObjective: To compare actual 90-day hospital costs between elective open
and laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer resection in a daily practice multicenter
setting stratified for operative risk.
Background: Laparoscopic resection has developed as a commonly accepted
surgical procedure for colorectal cancer. There are conflicting data on the
influence of laparoscopy on hospital costs, without separate analyses based on
operative risk.
Methods: Retrospective analyses using a population-based database (Dutch
Surgical Colorectal Audit). All elective resections for a T1-3N0-2M0 stage
colorectal cancer were included between 2010 and 2012 in 29 Dutch
hospitals. Operative risk was stratified for age (<75 years or 75 years)
and ASA status (I-II/III-IV). Ninety-day hospital costs were measured
uniformly in all hospitals based on time-driven activity-based costing.
Results: Total 90-day hospital costs ranged from s10474 to s20865 in the
predefined subgroups. For colon cancer surgery (N.4202), laparoscopic
resection was less expensive than open resection in all subgroups, savings
because of laparoscopy ranged from s409 (<75 years ASA I-II) to s1932
(75 years ASA I-II). In patients 75 years and ASA I-II, laparoscopic
resection was associated with 46% less mortality (P . 0.05), 41% less severe
complications (P < 0.001), 25% less hospital stay (P . 0.013), and 65% less
ICU stay (P < 0.001). For rectal cancer surgery (N.2328), all laparoscopic
subgroups had significantly higher total hospital costs, ranging from s501
(<75 years ASA I-II) to s2515 ( 75 years ASA III-IV).
Conclusions: Laparoscopic resection resulted in the largest cost reduction in
patients over 75 years with ASA I-II undergoing colonic resection, and the
largest cost increase in patients over 75 years with ASA III-IV undergoing
rectal resection as compared with an open approach.
Keywords: colorectal cancer, hospital costs, laparoscopy, population based
registry, resection, tumor
Show less- All authors
- Govaert, J.A.; Fiocco, M.; Dijk, W.A. van; Kolfschoten, N.E.; Prins, H.A.; Dekker, J.W.T.; Tollenaar, R.A.E.M.; Tanis, P.J.; Wouters, M.W.J.M.; Dutch Value Based Hlthcare
- Date
- 2016
- Journal
- Annals of Surgery