Documents
-
- Download
- Title pages_Acknowledgements_Contents_Tables
- open access
-
- Download
- Part I : Chapter 2
- open access
-
- Download
- Part I : Chapter 3
- open access
-
- Download
- Part II : Chapter 4
- open access
-
- Download
- Part II : Chapter 5
- open access
-
- Download
- Part II : Chapter 6
- open access
-
- Download
- Part III : Chapter 7
- open access
-
- Download
- Part III : Chapter 8
- open access
-
- Download
- Part III : Chapter 9
- open access
-
- Download
- Summary in English
- open access
-
- Download
- Summary in Dutch
- open access
-
- Download
- Appendices_Bibliography_Curriculum Vitae
- open access
-
- Download
- Propositions
- open access
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
'Greening’ the WTO Ban on China’s Export Duties : Should WTO law allow China to use export duties to protect the environment and, if so, in what manner?
According to the controversial China—Raw Materials and China—Rare Earths decisions, China is prohibited from using export duties to address any environmental problems, including those associated with climate change. This is unfortunate because a number of climate studies have suggested that export duties can be useful to tackle carbon leakage in China, being the largest emitter and exporter of carbon dioxide emissions.
This thesis argues that there is a need to consider ‘greening’ the absolute ban on China’s export duties. It accordingly proposes that, export duties - solely restricting exports - should be prohibited outright, while ‘export duties plus’ – restricting both exports and domestic consumption - should be allowed in pursuit of environmental advantages. There are three most feasible ways to achieve this balanced outcome: (i) a waiver as a stopgap measure, (ii) a Ministerial Decision or Declaration as a more flexible alternative, and (iii...
Show moreAccording to the controversial China—Raw Materials and China—Rare Earths decisions, China is prohibited from using export duties to address any environmental problems, including those associated with climate change. This is unfortunate because a number of climate studies have suggested that export duties can be useful to tackle carbon leakage in China, being the largest emitter and exporter of carbon dioxide emissions.
This thesis argues that there is a need to consider ‘greening’ the absolute ban on China’s export duties. It accordingly proposes that, export duties - solely restricting exports - should be prohibited outright, while ‘export duties plus’ – restricting both exports and domestic consumption - should be allowed in pursuit of environmental advantages. There are three most feasible ways to achieve this balanced outcome: (i) a waiver as a stopgap measure, (ii) a Ministerial Decision or Declaration as a more flexible alternative, and (iii) a legal interpretation for the Appellate Body to distinguish between export duties and ‘export duties plus’ as a judicial correction. With regard to the proposed judicial correction, even if the Appellate Body is no longer operational, it remains relevant for the purpose of injecting valuable flexibility into the WTO’s precedent system.
Show less- All authors
- Jiang, F.
- Supervisor
- Bronckers, M.C.E.J.
- Co-supervisor
- Cuyvers, A.
- Committee
- Baetens, F.; Bourgeois, J.H.J.; Lui, J.; Tobler, R.C.
- Qualification
- Doctor (dr.)
- Awarding Institution
- Institute of Public Law, Leiden Law School, Leiden University
- Date
- 2020-02-19
- Title of host publication
- Meijers-reeks
- ISBN (print)
- 9789402819243
Publication Series
- Name
- MI-338