Placebo and nocebo effects on itch: A review of experimental methods

Blythe, J.S.; Peerdeman, K.J.; Veldhuijzen, D.S.; Laarhoven, A.I.M. van; Evers, A.W.M.

doi:doi:10.1097/itx.0000000000000027

Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/81362

View statistics

In Collections

This item can be found in the following collections:

Institute of Psychology

Blythe, J.S.; Peerdeman, K.J.; Veldhuijzen, D.S.; Laarhoven, A.I.M. van; Evers, A.W.M. (2019)

Placebo and nocebo effects on itch: A review of experimental methods

Article / Letter to editor

Itch is a commonly experienced symptom of acute and chronic dermatological and systemic conditions. Placebo and nocebo effects, positive and negative effects experienced after both real and sham interventions, putatively due to positive or negative outcome expectancies, can have a significant impact on the experience of itch and its treatment. Experimental methods to induce and study placebo and nocebo effects on itch have been developed, utilizing various combinations of expectancy-induction methods (eg, conditioning, verbal suggestions) and short-acting itch-evoking stimuli (eg, histamine, electrical, or mechanical stimulation). The aim of this review is to describe the current research methods used to induce placebo and nocebo effects on itch, and the results of these studies. The benefits and drawbacks of different expectancy-induction methods and itch-evoking stimuli are described, and future directions for research and clinical application are discussed.