In this article, we test some specific claims made in the literature on relative distances among European languages and among Chinese dialects, suggesting that some language varieties within the Sinitic family traditionally called dialects are, in fact, more linguistically distant from one another than some European varieties that are traditionally called languages. More generally, we examine whether distances among varieties within and across European language families are larger than those within and across Sinitic language varieties. To this end, we computed lexico-phonetic as well as syntactic distance measures for comparable language materials in six Germanic, five Romance and six Slavic languages, as well as for six Mandarin and nine non-Mandarin (‘southern’) Chinese varieties. Lexico-phonetic distances were expressed as the length-normalized MPI weighted Levenshtein distances computed on the 100 most frequently used nouns in the 32 language varieties. Syntactic distance was implemented as the (complement of) the Pearson correlation coefficient found for the PoS trigram frequencies established for a parallel corpus of the same four texts translated into each of the 32 languages.
The lexico-phonetic distances proved relatively large and of approximately equal magnitude in the Germanic, Slavic and non-Mandarin Chinese language varieties. However, the lexico-phonetic distances among the Romance and Mandarin languages were considerably smaller, but of similar magnitude. Cantonese (Guangzhou dialect) is lexico-phonetically as distant from Standard Mandarin (Beijing dialect) as are European language pairs such as Portuguese-Italian, Portuguese-Romanian and Dutch-German. Syntactically, however, the differences among the Sinitic varieties are about ten times smaller than the differences among the European languages, both within and across the families – which provides some justification for the Chinese tradition to call the Sinitic varieties dialects of the same language.
Show less
