Leiden University Scholarly Publications

Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3899611

Documents

In Collections

This item can be found in the following collections:

Kuypers, K.L.A.M.; Kashyap, A.J.; Cramer, S.J.E.; Hooper, S.B.; Pas, A.B. te (2023)

The effect of imposed resistance in neonatal resuscitators on pressure stability and peak flows: a bench test

Article / Letter to editor
BackgroundThe importance of neonatal resuscitator resistance is currently unknown. In this study we investigated peak flows and pressure stability resulting from differences in imposed resistance during positive pressure ventilation(PPV) and simulated spontaneous breathing (SSB) between the r-PAP, low-resistance resuscitator, and Neopuff & TRADE;, high-resistance resuscitator.MethodsIn a bench test, 20 inflations during PPV and 20 breaths during SSB were analysed on breath-by-breath basis to determine peak flow and pressure stability using the Neopuff & TRADE; with bias gas flow of 8, 12 or 15 L/min and the r-PAP with total gas flow of 15 L/min.ResultsImposed resistance of the Neopuff & TRADE; was significantly reduced when the bias gas flow was increased from 8 to 15 L/min, which resulted in higher peak flows during PPV and SSB. Peak flows in the r-PAP were, however, significantly higher and fluctuations in CPAP during SSB were significantly smaller in the r-PAP compared to the...Show moreBackgroundThe importance of neonatal resuscitator resistance is currently unknown. In this study we investigated peak flows and pressure stability resulting from differences in imposed resistance during positive pressure ventilation(PPV) and simulated spontaneous breathing (SSB) between the r-PAP, low-resistance resuscitator, and Neopuff & TRADE;, high-resistance resuscitator.MethodsIn a bench test, 20 inflations during PPV and 20 breaths during SSB were analysed on breath-by-breath basis to determine peak flow and pressure stability using the Neopuff & TRADE; with bias gas flow of 8, 12 or 15 L/min and the r-PAP with total gas flow of 15 L/min.ResultsImposed resistance of the Neopuff & TRADE; was significantly reduced when the bias gas flow was increased from 8 to 15 L/min, which resulted in higher peak flows during PPV and SSB. Peak flows in the r-PAP were, however, significantly higher and fluctuations in CPAP during SSB were significantly smaller in the r-PAP compared to the Neopuff & TRADE; for all bias gas flow levels. During PPV, a pressure overshoot of 3.2 cmH(2)O was observed in the r-PAP.ConclusionsThe r-PAP seemed to have a lower resistance than the Neopuff & TRADE; even when bias gas flows were increased. This resulted in more stable CPAP pressures with higher peak flows when using the r-PAP.ImpactThe traditional T-piece system (Neopuff & TRADE;) has a higher imposed resistance compared to a new neonatal resuscitator (r-PAP).This study shows that reducing imposed resistance leads to smaller CPAP fluctuations and higher inspiratory and expiratory peak flows.High peak flows might negatively affect lung function and/or cause lung injury in preterm infants at birth. This study will form the rationale for further studies investigating these effects.A possible compromise might be to use the traditional T-piece system with a higher bias gas flow (12 L/min), thereby reducing the imposed resistance and generating more stable PEEP/CPAP pressures, while limiting potentially harmful peak flows.Show less
All authors
Kuypers, K.L.A.M.; Kashyap, A.J.; Cramer, S.J.E.; Hooper, S.B.; Pas, A.B. te
Date
2023-07-17
Journal
Pediatric Research
DOI
doi:10.1038/s41390-023-02715-x