Hoe te leven: klassiek of modern? Aristoteles en Hobbes vergeleken: een filosofische vergelijking tussen het klassieke en het moderne mens-, wereld- en samenlevingsbeeld

Külcü, H. (2024)

Doctoral Thesis

The fundamental research question in this dissertation is what the image of man - in the broadest sense of the word - entails within the classical and modern enlightenment points of view. This overarching question is considered with regard to the notions of man maintained by the ancients and moderns, with regard to their visions of society, and with regard to the worldview these theories entail. We also evaluate which of the two paradigms is the more convincing upon scrutiny. We have answered such questions by distilling the ideas of the classical philosopher Aristotle -and some ontological ideas from his teacher, Plato- on the one hand, and from the modern intellectual giant, Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand. This is premised on the belief that the essential features of the classical and modern idealtype are to be found within their thought and works.
In order to answer our central question, we had to look into the values which underly each vision of man. After all, values are the ideas that motivate our actions as individuals and as a community. We found that the classical vision is guided by the value of Virtue/Duty, Hierarchy and the pursuit of Community in a world permeated with objective values, whilst the modern conception embraces Freedom, Equality and Individuality in a world that is set free of objective values.

• Aristotle
• Hobbes
• Classical
• Modern
• Ontology
• Ethics
• Society
• Politics
• Metaphysics
• Worldview

• All authors: Külcü, H.
• Supervisor: Kinneging, A.A.M.
• Co-supervisor: Slootweg, T.J.M.
• Committee: Stoter, W.S.R.; Koops, E.; Storme, M.E.; Napel, H.M.T.D.; Cohen de Lara, E.
• Qualification: Doctor (dr.)
• Awarding Institution: Institute for the interdisciplinary Study of the Law, Faculty of Law, Leiden University
• Date: 2024-05-29
• ISBN (print): 9789493330856