Tailoring remote patient management in cardiovascular risk management for healthcare professionals using panel management: a qualitative study

Rakers, M.; Hattem, N. van; Simic, I.; Chavannes, N.; Peet, P. van; Bonten, T.; ... ; Os, H. van (2024)

Article / Letter to editor

Background While remote patient management (RPM) has the potential to assist in achieving treatment targets for cardiovascular risk factors in primary care, its effectiveness may vary among different patient subgroups. Panel management, which involves proactive care for specific patient risk groups, could offer a promising approach to tailor RPM to these groups. This study aims to (i) assess the perception of healthcare professionals and other stakeholders regarding the adoption and (ii) identify the barriers and facilitators for successfully implementing such a panel management approach. Methods In total, nineteen semi-structured interviews and two focus groups were conducted in the Netherlands. Three authors reviewed the audited transcripts. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Strategies (CFIR) domains were used for the thematic analysis. Results A total of 24 participants (GPs, nurses, health insurers, project managers, and IT consultants) participated. Overall, a panel management approach to RPM in primary care was considered valuable by various stakeholders. Implementation barriers encompassed concerns about missing necessary risk factors for patient stratification, additional clinical and technical tasks for nurses, and reimbursement agreements. Facilitators included tailoring consultation frequency and early detection of at-risk patients, an implementation manager accountable for supervising project procedures and establishing agreements on assessing implementation metrics, and ambassador roles. Conclusion Panel management could enhance proactive care and accurately identify which patients could benefit most from RPM to mitigate CVD risk. For successful implementation, we recommend having clear agreements on technical support, financial infrastructure and the criteria for measuring evaluation outcomes.

• Remote patient management
• Panel management
• Proactive care
• Prevention and management
• Cardiovascular disease

• All authors: Rakers, M.; Hattem, N. van; Simic, I.; Chavannes, N.; Peet, P. van; Bonten, T.; Vos, R.; Os, H. van
• Date: 2024-04-20
• Journal: BMC Primary Care
• Volume: 25
• Issue: 1
• DOI: doi:10.1186/s12875-024-02355-y