Effect of anatomical differences and intraocular lens design on negative dysphotopsia

Vught, L. van; Que, I.; Luyten, G.P.M.; Beenakker, J.W.M.

doi:doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001054

Purpose: To assess the effect of ocular anatomy and intraocular lens (IOL) design on negative dysphotopsia (ND).Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.Design: Ray-tracing study based on clinical data.Methods: Ray-tracing simulations were performed to assess the effect of anatomical differences and differences in IOL design on the peripheral retinal illumination. To that end, eye models that incorporate clinically measured anatomical differences between eyes of patients with ND and eyes of pseudophakic controls were created. The anatomical differences included pupil size, pupil centration, and iris tilt. The simulations were performed with different IOL designs, including a simple biconvex IOL design and a more complex clinical IOL design with a convex-concave anterior surface. Both IOL designs were analyzed using a clear edge and a frosted edge. As ND is generally considered to be caused by a discontinuity in peripheral...Show morePurpose: To assess the effect of ocular anatomy and intraocular lens (IOL) design on negative dysphotopsia (ND).Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.Design: Ray-tracing study based on clinical data.Methods: Ray-tracing simulations were performed to assess the effect of anatomical differences and differences in IOL design on the peripheral retinal illumination. To that end, eye models that incorporate clinically measured anatomical differences between eyes of patients with ND and eyes of pseudophakic controls were created. The anatomical differences included pupil size, pupil centration, and iris tilt. The simulations were performed with different IOL designs, including a simple biconvex IOL design and a more complex clinical IOL design with a convex-concave anterior surface. Both IOL designs were analyzed using a clear edge and a frosted edge. As ND is generally considered to be caused by a discontinuity in peripheral retinal illumination, this illumination profile was determined for each eye model and the severity of the discontinuity was compared between eye models.Results: The peripheral retinal illumination consistently showed a more severe discontinuity in illumination with ND-specific anatomy. This difference was the least pronounced, 8%, with the frosted edge clinical IOL and the most pronounced, 18%, with the clear edge biconvex IOL.Conclusions: These results show that small differences in the ocular anatomy or IOL design affect the peripheral retinal illumination. Therewith, they can increase the severity of ND by up to 18%. Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRSShow less

Leiden University Scholarly Publications

View statistics

Documents

In Collections

Effect of anatomical differences and intraocular lens design on negative dysphotopsia