Digital triage tools for sexually transmitted infection testing compared with general practitioners' advice: vignette-based qualitative study with interviews among general practitioners

Schnoor, K.; Versluis, A.; Chavannes, N.H.; Talboom-Kamp, E.P.W.A. (2024)

Article / Letter to editor

Background: Digital triage tools for sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing can potentially be used as a substitute for the triage that general practitioners (GPs) perform to lower their work pressure. The studied tool is based on medical guidelines. The same guidelines support GPs' decision-making process. However, research has shown that GPs make decisions from a holistic perspective and, therefore, do not always adhere to those guidelines. To have a high-quality digital triage tool that results in an efficient care process, it is important to learn more about GPs' decision-making process. Objective: The first objective was to identify whether the advice of the studied digital triage tool aligned with GPs' daily medical practice. The second objective was to learn which factors influence GPs' decisions regarding referral for diagnostic testing. In addition, this study provides insights into GPs' decision-making process. Methods: A qualitative vignette-based study using semistructured interviews was conducted. In total, 6 vignettes representing patient cases were discussed with the participants (GPs). The participants needed to think aloud whether they would advise an STI test for the patient and why. A thematic analysis was conducted on the transcripts of the interviews. The vignette patient cases were also passed through the digital triage tool, resulting in advice to test or not for an STI. A comparison was made between the advice of the tool and that of the participants. Results: In total, 10 interviews were conducted. Participants (GPs) had a mean age of 48.30 (SD 11.88) years. For 3 vignettes, the advice of the digital triage tool and of all participants was the same. In those vignettes, the patients' risk factors were sufficiently clear for the participants to advise the same as the digital tool. For 3 vignettes, the advice of the digital tool differed from that of the participants. Patient-related factors that influenced the participants' decision-making process were the patient's anxiety, young age, and willingness to be tested. Participants would test at a lower threshold than the triage tool because of those factors. Sometimes, participants wanted more information than was provided in the vignette or would like to conduct a physical examination. These elements were not part of the digital triage tool. Conclusions: The advice to conduct a diagnostic STI test differed between a digital triage tool and GPs. The digital triage tool considered only medical guidelines, whereas GPs were open to discussion reasoning from a holistic perspective. The GPs' decision-making process was influenced by patients' anxiety, willingness to be tested, and age. On the basis of these results, we believe that the digital triage tool for STI testing could support GPs and even replace consultations in the future. Further research must substantiate how this can be done safely.

• eHealth
• digital triage tool
• sexually transmitted infection
• STI
• human immunodeficiency virus
• general practitioners
• GPs decision-making
• digital health
• diagnostic
• sexually transmitted disease
• STD
• sexually transmitted
• sexual transmission
• triage
• artificial intelligence
• HIV
• diagnostics
• diagnosis
• vignette
• vignettes
• interview
• interviews
• best practice
• best practices
• thematic analysis
• referral
• medical advice

• All authors: Schnoor, K.; Versluis, A.; Chavannes, N.H.; Talboom-Kamp, E.P.W.A.
• Date: 2024-01-01
• Journal: JMIR Human Factors
• Volume: 11
• DOI: doi:10.2196/49221