Thresholds for unacceptable work state in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis of four presenteeism and two clinical outcome measurement instruments

Capelusnik, D.; Ramiro, S.; Nikiphorou, E.; Maksymowych, W.P.; Magrey, M.N.; Marzo-Ortega, H.; Boonen, A.

doi:doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keae033

Objectives: To a) identify threshold values of presenteeism measurement instruments that reflect unacceptable work state in employed r-axSpA patients; b) determine whether those thresholds accurately predict future adverse work outcomes (AWO) (sick leave or short/long-term disability); c) evaluate the performance of traditional health-outcomes for r-axSpA; d) explore whether thresholds are stable across contextual factors. Methods: Data from the multinational AS-PROSE study was used. Thresholds to determine whether patients consider themselves in an 'unacceptable work state' were calculated at baseline for four instruments assessing presenteeism and two health-outcomes specific for r-axSpA. Different approaches derived from the receiver operating characteristic methodology were used. Validity of the optimal thresholds was tested across contextual factors and for predicting future AWO over 12 months. Results: Of 366 working patients, 15% reported an unacceptable work state; 6%...Show moreObjectives: To a) identify threshold values of presenteeism measurement instruments that reflect unacceptable work state in employed r-axSpA patients; b) determine whether those thresholds accurately predict future adverse work outcomes (AWO) (sick leave or short/long-term disability); c) evaluate the performance of traditional health-outcomes for r-axSpA; d) explore whether thresholds are stable across contextual factors. Methods: Data from the multinational AS-PROSE study was used. Thresholds to determine whether patients consider themselves in an 'unacceptable work state' were calculated at baseline for four instruments assessing presenteeism and two health-outcomes specific for r-axSpA. Different approaches derived from the receiver operating characteristic methodology were used. Validity of the optimal thresholds was tested across contextual factors and for predicting future AWO over 12 months. Results: Of 366 working patients, 15% reported an unacceptable work state; 6% experienced at least one AWO in 12 months. Optimal thresholds were: WPAI-presenteeism >= 40 (AUC 0.85), QQ-method <97 (0.76), WALS >= 0.75 (AUC 0.87), WLQ-25 >= 29 (AUC 0.85). BASDAI and BASFI performed similarly to the presenteeism instruments: >= 4.7 (AUC 0.82) and >= 3.5 (AUC 0.79), respectively. Thresholds for WALS and WLQ-25 were stable across contextual factors, while for all other instruments they overestimated unacceptable work state in lower educated persons. Proposed thresholds could also predict future AWO, although with lower performance, especially for QQ-method, BASDAI and BASFI. Conclusions: Thresholds of measurement instruments for presenteeism and health status to identify unacceptable work state have been established. These thresholds can help in daily clinical practice to provide work related support to r-axSpA patients at risk for AWO.Show less

Leiden University Scholarly Publications

View statistics

Documents

In Collections

Thresholds for unacceptable work state in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis of four presenteeism and two clinical outcome measurement instruments