Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3673461
Documents
-
- Full Text
- under embargo until 2025-06-14
-
- Download
- Title pages_Contents_Abbreviations
-
open access
-
- Chapter 1
- under embargo until 2025-06-14
-
- Chapter 2
- under embargo until 2025-06-14
-
- Chapter 3
- under embargo until 2025-06-14
-
- Chapter 4
- under embargo until 2025-06-14
-
- Chapter 5
- under embargo until 2025-06-14
-
- Chapter 6
- under embargo until 2025-06-14
-
- Chapter 7
- under embargo until 2025-06-14
-
- Download
- Summary in Dutch
-
open access
-
- Download
- Bibliography_Curriculum Vitae
-
open access
-
- Download
- Propositions
-
open access
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
Single supervision, single judicial protection? Towards effective judicial protection in Single Supervisory Mechanism composite procedures
Composite procedures culminate in a final ECB or NCA decision, yet are based on input from both. This integrated decision-making forms a paradox with the European system of judicial protection, which to an important extent remains to be organised dualistically. In short, national courts still review only national acts while the EU Courts, in principle, review only EU acts.
This paradox raises concerns regarding effective judicial protection. This dissertation aims to investigate whether the EU principle of effective judicial protection is currently safeguarded within the...Show moreTen years ago, the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) was created, centralizing European banking supervision. In the SSM, the European Central Bank (ECB) cooperates closely with the National Competent Authorities (NCAs). The unprecedented degree of integration between NCAs and the ECB leads to supervision often being a joint exercise. SSM composite procedures are a specific type of such a joint exercise.
Composite procedures culminate in a final ECB or NCA decision, yet are based on input from both. This integrated decision-making forms a paradox with the European system of judicial protection, which to an important extent remains to be organised dualistically. In short, national courts still review only national acts while the EU Courts, in principle, review only EU acts.
This paradox raises concerns regarding effective judicial protection. This dissertation aims to investigate whether the EU principle of effective judicial protection is currently safeguarded within the SSM, particularly where it concerns composite procedures. It examines both the action for annulment and the action for damages, addressing the interplay between the EU and Dutch national legal framework. It is concluded that effective judicial protection is not always achieved. The dissertation therefore proposes several recommendations aimed at enhancing effective judicial protection within SSM composite procedures.
Show less
- All authors
- Tegelaar, J.T.
- Supervisor
- Haentjens, M.; Ouden, W. den
- Committee
- Barkhuysen, T.; Hofmann, H.C.H.; Ottervanger, T.R.; Widdershoven, R.J.G.M.; Zilioli, C.
- Qualification
- Doctor (dr.)
- Awarding Institution
- Institute of Private Law , Faculty of Law , Leiden University
- Date
- 2023-12-14
- Title of host publication
- Meijers-reeks
Publication Series
- Name
- MI 411
Funding
- Sponsorship
- Stichting Hazelhoff Van Huet E.M. Meijers Instituut