Leiden University Scholarly Publications

Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3633592

Documents

In Collections

This item can be found in the following collections:

Teuwen, M.M.H.; Knaapen, I.R.E.; Vlieland, T.P.M.V.; Schoones, J.W.; Ende, C.H.M. van den; Weely, S.F.E. van; Gademan, M.G.J. (2023)

The use of PROMIS measures in clinical studies in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review

Article / Letter to editor
Purpose: Although the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures is widely advocated, little is known on their use in patients with inflammatory arthritis. We systematically describe the use and outcomes of PROMIS measures in clinical studies involving people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Through a systematic search of nine electronic databases, clinical studies including patients with RA or axSpA and reporting the use of PROMIS measure were selected. Study characteristics, details of PROMIS measures and their outcomes, if available, were extracted. Results: In total, 29 studies described in 40 articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 25 studies included RA patients, three studies included axSpA patients and one study included both RA and axSpA patients. The use of two general PROMIS measures (PROMIS Global Health, PROMIS...Show morePurpose: Although the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures is widely advocated, little is known on their use in patients with inflammatory arthritis. We systematically describe the use and outcomes of PROMIS measures in clinical studies involving people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Through a systematic search of nine electronic databases, clinical studies including patients with RA or axSpA and reporting the use of PROMIS measure were selected. Study characteristics, details of PROMIS measures and their outcomes, if available, were extracted. Results: In total, 29 studies described in 40 articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 25 studies included RA patients, three studies included axSpA patients and one study included both RA and axSpA patients. The use of two general PROMIS measures (PROMIS Global Health, PROMIS-29) and 13 different domain-specific PROMIS measures was reported, of which the PROMIS Pain Interference (n = 17), Physical Function (n = 14), Fatigue (n = 13), and Depression (n = 12) measures were most frequently used. Twenty-one studies reported their results in terms of T-scores. Most T-scores were worse than the general population mean, indicating impairments of health status. Eight studies did not report actual data but rather measurement properties of the PROMIS measures. Conclusion: There was considerable variety regarding the different PROMIS measures used, with the PROMIS Pain interference, Physical function, Fatigue, and Depression measures being the most frequently used. In order to facilitate the comparisons across studies, more standardization of the selection of PROMIS measures is needed.Show less
Systematic review
PROMIS
Patient-reported outcome measures
Rheumatoid arthritis
Axial spondyloarthritis
All authors
Teuwen, M.M.H.; Knaapen, I.R.E.; Vlieland, T.P.M.V.; Schoones, J.W.; Ende, C.H.M. van den; Weely, S.F.E. van; Gademan, M.G.J.
Date
2023-04-27
Journal
Quality of Life Research
DOI
doi:10.1007/s11136-023-03422-0