Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3594558
Documents
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
Mind your words: oncologists' communication that potentially harms patients with advanced cancer: a survey on patient perspectives
Background
Many complaints in medicine and in advanced illnesses are about communication. Little is known about which specific communications harm. This study explored the perspectives of patients with advanced cancer about potentially harmful communication behaviors by oncologists and helpful alternatives.
Methods
An online survey design was used that was based on literature scoping and patient/clinician/researcher input. Patients with advanced cancer (n = 74) reflected on the potential harmfulness of 19 communication situations. They were asked whether they perceived the situation as one in which communication could be harmful (yes/no). If they answered “yes,” they were asked whether they perceived the examples as harmful (yes/no) or helpful (yes/no) and to provide open comments. Results were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively (content analysis).
Results
Communication regarding information provision, prognosis discussion, decision...
Show moreBackground
Many complaints in medicine and in advanced illnesses are about communication. Little is known about which specific communications harm. This study explored the perspectives of patients with advanced cancer about potentially harmful communication behaviors by oncologists and helpful alternatives.
Methods
An online survey design was used that was based on literature scoping and patient/clinician/researcher input. Patients with advanced cancer (n = 74) reflected on the potential harmfulness of 19 communication situations. They were asked whether they perceived the situation as one in which communication could be harmful (yes/no). If they answered “yes,” they were asked whether they perceived the examples as harmful (yes/no) or helpful (yes/no) and to provide open comments. Results were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively (content analysis).
Results
Communication regarding information provision, prognosis discussion, decision-making, and empathy could be unnecessarily potentially harmful, and this occurred in various ways, such as making vague promises instead of concrete ones (92%), being too directive in decision-making (qualitative), and not listening to the patient (88%). Not all patients considered other situations potentially harmful (eg, introducing the option of refraining from anticancer therapy [49%] and giving too much [prognostic] information [60%]). Exploring each individual patients' needs/preferences seemed to be a precondition for helpful communication.
Conclusions
This article provides patient perspectives on oncologists' unnecessarily potentially harmful communication behaviors and offers practical tools to improve communication in advanced cancer care. Both preventable pitfalls and delicate challenges requiring an individualized approach, where exploration might help, are described. Although providing difficult and unwelcome news is a core task for clinicians, this study might help them to do so while preventing potentially unnecessary harm.
Show less- All authors
- Westendorp, J.; Evers, A.W. M.; Stouthard, J.M.L.; Budding, J.; Wall, E.; Plum, N.M.F.; Velting, M.; Francke, A.L.; Dulmen, S.; Hartman, T.C.; Vliet, L.M. van
- Date
- 2021-11-11
- Journal
- Cancer
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1133 - 1140
Funding
- Grant number
- Leids University Funds/Schild-de Groen Funds (W19312-5-38) Dutch Cancer Society (YIG 10392)