Discussing results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients and healthcare professionals in routine dialysis care: a qualitative study

Willik, E.M. van der; Milders, J.; Bart, J.A.J.; Bos, W.J.W.; Ittersum, F.J. van; Dam, M.A.G.J. ten; ... ; Meuleman, Y. (2022)

Article / Letter to editor

Objectives: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide insight into patients' experienced health and needs, and can improve patient-professional communication. However, little is known about how to discuss PROM results. This study aimed to provide in-depth knowledge of patients' and healthcare professionals' experiences with and perspectives on discussing PROM results as part of routine dialysis care..Design: A qualitative study was performed using an interpretive description approach. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 patients and healthcare professionals. Interviews focused on general and specific situations (eg, addressing sensitive topics or when no medical treatment is available). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed inductively using thematic analysis. Setting: Participants were purposively sampled from eight dialysis centres across the Netherlands.ParticipantsInterviews were conducted with 10 patients receiving dialysis treatment and 12 healthcare professionals (nephrologists and nurses). Results: Patients and healthcare professionals provided practical guidance for optimal discussion about PROM results. First, patients and healthcare professionals emphasised that PROM results should always be discussed and indicated how to create a suitable setting, adequately prepare, deal with time constraints and use PROMs as a tool for personalised holistic consultations. Second, patients should actively participate and healthcare professionals should take a guiding role. A trusting patient-professional relationship was considered a prerequisite and patient-professional interaction was described as a collaboration in which both contribute their knowledge, experiences and ideas. Third, follow-up after discussing PROM results was considered important, including evaluations and actions (eg, symptom management) structurally embedded into the multidisciplinary treatment process. These general themes also applied to the specific situations, for example: results should also be discussed when no medical treatment is available. Though, healthcare professionals were expected to take more initiative and a leading role when discussing sensitive topics. Conclusions: This study provides insight into how to organise and conduct conversations about PROM results and lays the foundation for training healthcare professionals to optimally discuss PROM results in routine nephrology care. Further research is needed to provide guidance on follow-up actions in response to specific PROM results.

• QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
• MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING
• SOCIAL MEDICINE
• Dialysis
• Quality in health care

• All authors: Willik, E.M. van der; Milders, J.; Bart, J.A.J.; Bos, W.J.W.; Ittersum, F.J. van; Dam, M.A.G.J. ten; Hemmelder, M.H.; Dekker, F.W.; Meuleman, Y.
• Date: 2022-11-01
• Journal: BMJ Open
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 11
• DOI: doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067044