A deep learning approach to upscaling &quot;low-quality&quot; MR images: an In Silico Comparison Study based on the UNet Framework

Sharma, R.; Tsiamyrtzis, P.; Webb, A.G.; Seimenis, I.; Loukas, C.; Leiss, E.; Tsekos, N.V.

doi:doi:10.3390/app122211758

MR scans of low-gamma X-nuclei, low-concentration metabolites, or standard imaging at very low field entail a challenging tradeoff between resolution, signal-to-noise, and acquisition duration. Deep learning (DL) techniques, such as UNets, can potentially be used to improve such "low-quality" (LQ) images. We investigate three UNets for upscaling LQ MRI: dense (DUNet), robust (RUNet), and anisotropic (AUNet). These were evaluated for two acquisition scenarios. In the same-subject High-Quality Complementary Priors (HQCP) scenario, an LQ and a high quality (HQ) image are collected and both LQ and HQ were inputs to the UNets. In the No Complementary Priors (NoCP) scenario, only the LQ images are collected and used as the sole input to the UNets. To address the lack of same-subject LQ and HQ images, we added data from the OASIS-1 database. The UNets were tested in upscaling 1/8, 1/4, and 1/2 undersampled images for both scenarios. As manifested by non-statically significant...Show moreMR scans of low-gamma X-nuclei, low-concentration metabolites, or standard imaging at very low field entail a challenging tradeoff between resolution, signal-to-noise, and acquisition duration. Deep learning (DL) techniques, such as UNets, can potentially be used to improve such "low-quality" (LQ) images. We investigate three UNets for upscaling LQ MRI: dense (DUNet), robust (RUNet), and anisotropic (AUNet). These were evaluated for two acquisition scenarios. In the same-subject High-Quality Complementary Priors (HQCP) scenario, an LQ and a high quality (HQ) image are collected and both LQ and HQ were inputs to the UNets. In the No Complementary Priors (NoCP) scenario, only the LQ images are collected and used as the sole input to the UNets. To address the lack of same-subject LQ and HQ images, we added data from the OASIS-1 database. The UNets were tested in upscaling 1/8, 1/4, and 1/2 undersampled images for both scenarios. As manifested by non-statically significant differences of matrices, also supported by subjective observation, the three UNets upscaled images equally well. This was in contrast to mixed effects statistics that clearly illustrated significant differences. Observations suggest that the detailed architecture of these UNets may not play a critical role. As expected, HQCP substantially improves upscaling with any of the UNets. The outcomes support the notion that DL methods may have merit as an integral part of integrated holistic approaches in advancing special MRI acquisitions; however, primary attention should be paid to the foundational step of such approaches, i.e., the actual data collected.Show less

Leiden University Scholarly Publications

View statistics

Documents

In Collections

A deep learning approach to upscaling "low-quality" MR images: an In Silico Comparison Study based on the UNet Framework