Three-dimensional quantitative margin assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with percutaneous thermal ablation using semi-automatic rigid MRI/CECT-CECT co-registration

Faber, R.A.; Burghout, K.S.T.; Bijlstra, O.D.; Hendriks, P.; Erp, G.C.M.V.; Broersen, A.; Dijkstra, J.; Vahrmeijer, A.L.; Burgmans, M.C.; Mieog, J.S.D.

doi:doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110552

Purpose: To assess the quantitative minimal ablation margin (MAM) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with percutaneous thermal ablation (TA) and correlate the quantitative MAM with local tumour recurrence (LTR).Method: Thirty-nine of 143 patients with solitary or multiple CRLM who underwent a first percutaneous TA procedure between January 2011 and May 2020 were considered eligible for study enrolment. Image fusion of pre-and post-ablation scans and 3D quantitative MAM assessment was performed using the in-house developed semi-automatic rigid MRI/CECT-CECT co-registration software deLIVERed. The quantitative MAM was analysed and correlated with LTR.Results: Eighteen (46 %) patients were additionally excluded from further analyses due to suboptimal co -registration (quality co-registration score < 3). The quality of co-registration was considered sufficient in 21 (54 %) patients with a total of 29 CRLM. LTR was found in 5 of 29 (17 %) TA-treated CRLM. In...Show morePurpose: To assess the quantitative minimal ablation margin (MAM) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with percutaneous thermal ablation (TA) and correlate the quantitative MAM with local tumour recurrence (LTR).Method: Thirty-nine of 143 patients with solitary or multiple CRLM who underwent a first percutaneous TA procedure between January 2011 and May 2020 were considered eligible for study enrolment. Image fusion of pre-and post-ablation scans and 3D quantitative MAM assessment was performed using the in-house developed semi-automatic rigid MRI/CECT-CECT co-registration software deLIVERed. The quantitative MAM was analysed and correlated with LTR.Results: Eighteen (46 %) patients were additionally excluded from further analyses due to suboptimal co -registration (quality co-registration score < 3). The quality of co-registration was considered sufficient in 21 (54 %) patients with a total of 29 CRLM. LTR was found in 5 of 29 (17 %) TA-treated CRLM. In total, 12 (41 %) negative MAMs were measured (mean MAM-4.7 +/- 2.7 mm). Negative MAMs were significantly more frequently seen in patients who developed LTR (100 %) compared to those without LTR (29 %; p = 0.003). The median MAM of patients who developed LTR (-6.6 mm (IQR-9.5 to-4.6)) was significantly smaller compared to the median MAM of patients without LTR (0.5 mm (IQR-1.8 to 3.0); p < 0.001). The ROC curve showed high accuracy in predicting LTR for the quantitative MAM (area under the curve of 0.975 +/- 0.029).Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of 3D quantitative MAM assessment, using deLIVERed co -registration software, to assess technical success of TA in patients with CRLM and to predict LTR.Show less

Leiden University Scholarly Publications

View statistics

Documents

In Collections

Three-dimensional quantitative margin assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with percutaneous thermal ablation using semi-automatic rigid MRI/CECT-CECT co-registration