Patient activation during the first 6 months after the start of stroke rehabilitation

Meijeren-Pont Winke, van; Tamminga, S.J.; Fiocco, M.; Avila, A.G.; Volker, G.; Janssen, S.M.J.; ... ; Oosterveer, D.M. (2022)

Article / Letter to editor

Objective: To examine patient activation from the start of stroke rehabilitation and its course up until the 6-month follow-up. Design: Inception cohort study with a follow-up of 6 months. Setting: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation facility. Participants: A total of 478 patients (N=478) with stroke who received inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation, with a median age of 63.0 years (interquartile range, 56.0-70.0 years) with 308 (64.2%) being men. The study was completed by 439 patients (91.8%). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Patient activation was measured with the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) (score 0-100, 4 levels, where a higher score and level denotes more patient activation). The PAM was measured at the start of the rehabilitation (baseline) and 3 and 6 months thereafter and was analyzed using the multivariate mixed model analysis. Results: At baseline, the mean PAM score was 60.2 +/- 14.3, with the number of patients in PAM levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 being 76 (17.8%), 85 (19.9%), 177 (41.4%), and 90 (21.0%), respectively. The multivariate mixed-model analysis demonstrated that the PAM score increased over time (baseline 60.2 +/- 14.3 vs 3 months 60.7 +/- 14.8 vs 6 months 61.9 +/- 18.0; P.007). Between baseline and 6 months, 122 patients (41.4%) remained at the same PAM level, 105 patients (35.6%) increased, and 68 patients (23.1%) decreased. At all time points, > 35% of patients were in level 1 or 2. Conclusions: PAM scores increased slightly over time from the start of rehabilitation up to the 6-month follow-up. However, more than one-third of patients remained at low levels (ie, level 1 and 2) of patient activation, which indicates that specific interventions during rehabilitation to increase patient activation might be of value. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022;103:1360-7 (c) 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

• All authors: Meijeren-Pont Winke, van; Tamminga, S.J.; Fiocco, M.; Avila, A.G.; Volker, G.; Janssen, S.M.J.; Vlieland Vliet, T.P.M.; Oosterveer, D.M.
• Date: 2022-07-01
• Journal: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
• Volume: 103
• Issue: 7
• Pages: 1360 - 1367
• DOI: doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2022.02.017