Endoscopic versus surgical step-up approach for infected necrotizing pancreatitis (ExTENSION):: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial

Onnekink, A.M.; Boxhoorn, L.; Timmerhuis, H.C.; Bac, S.T.; Besselink, M.G.; Boermeester, M.A.; Bollen, T.L.; Bosscha, K.; Bouwense, S.A.W.; Bruno, M.J.; Brunschot, S. van; Cappendijk, V.C.; Consten, E.C.J.; Dejong, C.H.; Dijkgraaf, M.G.W.; Eijck, C.H.J. van; Erkelens, W.G.; Goor, H. van; Grinsven, J. van; Haveman, J.W.; Hooft, J.E. van; Jansen, J.M.; Lienden, K.P. van; Meijssen, M.A.C.; Nieuwenhuijs, V.B.; Poley, J.W.; Quispel, R.; Ridder, R.J. de; Romkens, T.E.H.; Santvoort, H.C. van; Scheepers, J.J.; Schwartz, M.P.; Seerden, T.; Spanier, M.B.W.; Straathof, J.W.A.; Timmer, R.; Venneman, N.G.; Verdonk, R.C.; Vleggaar, F.P.; Wanrooij, R.L. van; Witteman, B.M.; Fockens, P.; Voermans, R.P.

doi:doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.015

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Previous randomized trials, including the Transluminal Endoscopic Step-Up Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Step-Up Approach in Patients With Infected Pancreatic Necrosis (TENSION) trial, demonstrated that the endoscopic step-up approach might be preferred over the surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis based on favorable short-term outcomes. We compared long-term clinical outcomes of both step-up approaches after a period of at least 5 years. METHODS: In this long-term follow-up study, we reevaluated all clinical data on 83 patients (of the originally 98 included patients) from the TENSION trial who were still alive after the initial 6-month follow-up. The primary end point, similar to the TENSION trial, was a composite of death and major complications. Secondary end points included individual major complications, pancreaticocutaneous fistula, reinterventions, pancreatic insufficiency, and quality of life. RESULTS:...Show moreBACKGROUND & AIMS: Previous randomized trials, including the Transluminal Endoscopic Step-Up Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Step-Up Approach in Patients With Infected Pancreatic Necrosis (TENSION) trial, demonstrated that the endoscopic step-up approach might be preferred over the surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis based on favorable short-term outcomes. We compared long-term clinical outcomes of both step-up approaches after a period of at least 5 years. METHODS: In this long-term follow-up study, we reevaluated all clinical data on 83 patients (of the originally 98 included patients) from the TENSION trial who were still alive after the initial 6-month follow-up. The primary end point, similar to the TENSION trial, was a composite of death and major complications. Secondary end points included individual major complications, pancreaticocutaneous fistula, reinterventions, pancreatic insufficiency, and quality of life. RESULTS: After a mean followup period of 7 years, the primary end point occurred in 27 patients (53%) in the endoscopy group and in 27 patients (57%) in the surgery group (risk ratio [RR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.32; P = .688). Fewer pancreaticocutaneous fistulas were identified in the endoscopy group (8% vs 34%; RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.83). After the initial 6-month follow-up, the endoscopy group needed fewer reinterventions than the surgery group (7% vs 24%; RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.99). Pancreatic insufficiency and quality of life did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: At long-term follow-up, the endoscopic step-up approach was not superior to the surgical step-up approach in reducing death or major complications in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. However, patients assigned to the endoscopic approach developed overall fewer pancreaticocutaneous fistulas and needed fewer reinterventions after the initial 6-month follow-up.Show less

Leiden University Scholarly Publications

View statistics

Documents

In Collections

Endoscopic versus surgical step-up approach for infected necrotizing pancreatitis (ExTENSION): long-term follow-up of a randomized trial