Oral ibuprofen is more effective than intravenous ibuprofen for closure of a patent ductus arteriosus: can pharmacokinetic modeling help us to understand why?

Smit, C.; Engbers, A.G.J.; Samiee-Zafarghandy, S.; Donge, T. van; Simons, S.H.P.; Flint, R.B.; Pfister, M.; Knibbe, C.A.J.; Anker, J.N. van den

doi:doi:10.1159/000526210

Introduction: Oral ibuprofen is more effective than intravenous (IV) ibuprofen for closure of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). This study explored whether higher concentrations of the biologically active S-enantiomer or increased R- to S-conversion following oral dosing could explain this finding. Methods: Two datasets containing 370 S- and R-ibuprofen concentrations from 95 neonates with PDA treated with oral (n = 27, 28%) or IV ibuprofen were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Concentration-time profiles in typical neonates were explored and compared in different dosing or R- to S-conversion scenarios. Results: Postnatal age (PNA), gestational age (GA), and being small for GA impacted S- and R-ibuprofen clearance. Upon oral dosing, S-ibuprofen concentrations were lower compared to IV ibuprofen for a large part of the dosing interval. We could show that R- to Sconversion will not exceed 45%. Exploration of a 30% presystemic R- to S-conversion resulted in a 25-32%...Show moreIntroduction: Oral ibuprofen is more effective than intravenous (IV) ibuprofen for closure of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). This study explored whether higher concentrations of the biologically active S-enantiomer or increased R- to S-conversion following oral dosing could explain this finding. Methods: Two datasets containing 370 S- and R-ibuprofen concentrations from 95 neonates with PDA treated with oral (n = 27, 28%) or IV ibuprofen were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Concentration-time profiles in typical neonates were explored and compared in different dosing or R- to S-conversion scenarios. Results: Postnatal age (PNA), gestational age (GA), and being small for GA impacted S- and R-ibuprofen clearance. Upon oral dosing, S-ibuprofen concentrations were lower compared to IV ibuprofen for a large part of the dosing interval. We could show that R- to Sconversion will not exceed 45%. Exploration of a 30% presystemic R- to S-conversion resulted in a 25-32% increase in S-ibuprofen exposure following oral administration with AUC(72h) values varying between 700-2,213 mg*h/L (oral) and 531-1,762 (IV) for the standard or 1,704-2,893 (oral) and 1,295-2,271 mg*h/L (IV) for PNA-based dosing. Discussion: The absence of higher S-ibuprofen concentrations does not support a beneficial concentration-time profile after oral dosing. While a fraction of up to 45% presystemic R- to S-conversion could not be ruled out, the impact of such a low conversion might be only relevant for the standard but not high dosing regimens, considering reported exposure-response targets. Perhaps, the lack of high peak concentrations observed following IV dosing may play a role in the observed effects upon oral dosing. 1.% 2022 The Author(s).Show less

Leiden University Scholarly Publications

View statistics

Documents

In Collections

Oral ibuprofen is more effective than intravenous ibuprofen for closure of a patent ductus arteriosus: can pharmacokinetic modeling help us to understand why?