Prospective validation of craniocaudal tumour size on MR imaging compared to histoPAthology in patients with uterine cervical cancer: the MPAC study

Boer, P. de; Spijkerboer, A.M.; Bleeker, M.C.G.; Lonkhuijzen, L.R.C.W. van; Monraats, M.A.; Nederveen, A.J.; Vijver, M.J. van de; Kenter, G.G.; Bel, A.; Rasch, C.R.N.; Stoker, J.; Stalpers, L.J.A.

doi:doi:10.1016/j.ctro.2019.06.004

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of MRI in detecting craniocaudal tumour extension, compared to histopathology, of the hysterectomy specimen in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer. Three complementary methods were investigated.Materials and methods: Thirty-four patients with early-stage cervical cancer had pre-operative MRI, followed by radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy. 1) craniocaudal tumour extension was measured on MRI by two radiologists and compared to microscopy by a pathologist, 2) to compensate for changes in uterine shape between pre-operative MRI and the surgical specimen, craniocaudal tumour extensions were directly compared and appreciated as being a part of a 3-dimensional tumour by a radiation oncologist and resident, and 3) tumour size on MRI was compared macroscopically after digital non-rigid registration of the uterus, uterine cavity and tumour of both modalities.Results: The craniocaudal tumour extension measured on histopathology minus MRI...Show morePurpose: To determine the accuracy of MRI in detecting craniocaudal tumour extension, compared to histopathology, of the hysterectomy specimen in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer. Three complementary methods were investigated.Materials and methods: Thirty-four patients with early-stage cervical cancer had pre-operative MRI, followed by radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy. 1) craniocaudal tumour extension was measured on MRI by two radiologists and compared to microscopy by a pathologist, 2) to compensate for changes in uterine shape between pre-operative MRI and the surgical specimen, craniocaudal tumour extensions were directly compared and appreciated as being a part of a 3-dimensional tumour by a radiation oncologist and resident, and 3) tumour size on MRI was compared macroscopically after digital non-rigid registration of the uterus, uterine cavity and tumour of both modalities.Results: The craniocaudal tumour extension measured on histopathology minus MRI gives: 1) on average +3 mm difference when measured by a radiologist compared to the microscopic extension (range -13 to +15 mm), 2) -0.2 mm (range -11 to +6.0 mm) when evaluated on MRI by a radiation oncologist compared to the macroscopic tumour; 3) after non-rigid organ registration, a margin of 10 mm around the tumour on MRI would be needed to cover 95% of the tumour in 90% of the patients.Conclusions: Results indicate that microscopic tumour extension towards the uterine fundus is within a margin of 10 mm around the visible tumour on MRI. The major source of measurement uncertainty is post-surgical change of organ shape and form. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology.Show less

Leiden University Scholarly Publications

View statistics

Documents

In Collections

Prospective validation of craniocaudal tumour size on MR imaging compared to histoPAthology in patients with uterine cervical cancer: the MPAC study