Leiden University Scholarly Publications

Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3277490

In Collections

This item can be found in the following collections:

Constantino, C.S.; Oliveira, F.P.M.; Silva, M.; Oliveira, C.; Castanheira, J.C.; Silva, A.; ... ; Costa, D.C. (2020)

Are lesion features reproducible between F-18-FDG PET/CT images when acquired on analog or digital PET/CT scanners?

Article / Letter to editor
Objectives To compare lesion features extracted from F-18-FDG PET/CT images acquired on analog and digital scanners, on consecutive imaging data from the same subjects. Methods Whole-body F-18-FDG PET/CT images from 55 oncological patients were acquired twice after a single F-18-FDG injection, with a digital and an analog PET/CT scanner, alternately. Twenty-nine subjects were examined first on the digital, and 26 first on the analog equipment. Image reconstruction was performed using manufacturer standard clinical protocols and protocols that fulfilled EARL1 specifications. Twenty-five features based on lesion standardized uptake value (SUV) and geometry were assessed. To compare these features, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), relative difference (RD), absolute value of RD (|RD|), and repeatability coefficient (RC) were used. Results In total, 323 F-18-FDG avid lesions were identified. High agreement (ICC > 0.75) was obtained for most of the lesion features pulled out from...Show moreObjectives To compare lesion features extracted from F-18-FDG PET/CT images acquired on analog and digital scanners, on consecutive imaging data from the same subjects. Methods Whole-body F-18-FDG PET/CT images from 55 oncological patients were acquired twice after a single F-18-FDG injection, with a digital and an analog PET/CT scanner, alternately. Twenty-nine subjects were examined first on the digital, and 26 first on the analog equipment. Image reconstruction was performed using manufacturer standard clinical protocols and protocols that fulfilled EARL1 specifications. Twenty-five features based on lesion standardized uptake value (SUV) and geometry were assessed. To compare these features, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), relative difference (RD), absolute value of RD (|RD|), and repeatability coefficient (RC) were used. Results In total, 323 F-18-FDG avid lesions were identified. High agreement (ICC > 0.75) was obtained for most of the lesion features pulled out from both scanners' imaging data, especially when reconstruction protocols fulfilled EARL1 specifications. For EARL1 reconstruction images, the features frequently used in clinics, SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis, reached an ICC of 0.92, 0.95, 0.87, 0.98, and 0.98, and a median RD (digital-analog) of 3%, 5%, 4%, - 3% and 1%, respectively. Using standard reconstruction protocols, the ICC were 0.84, 0.93, 0.80, 0.98, and 0.98, and the RD were 20%, 11%, 13%, - 7%, and 7%, respectively. Conclusion Under controlled acquisition and reconstruction parameters, most of the features studied can be used for research and clinical work. This is especially important for multicenter studies and patient follow-ups.Show less
18F-FDG PET
CT
Computer-assisted image analysis
Image reconstruction
Diagnostic imaging
Reproducibility of results
All authors
Constantino, C.S.; Oliveira, F.P.M.; Silva, M.; Oliveira, C.; Castanheira, J.C.; Silva, A.; Vaz, S.C.; Vieira, P.; Costa, D.C.
Date
2020-10-30
Journal
European Radiology
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
3071 - 3079
DOI
doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07390-8