Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in child and youth mental health; comparison of routine outcome measurements of an Australian and Dutch outpatient cohort

Roest, S.L.; Siebelink, B.M.; Ewijk, H. van; Vermeiren, R.R.J.M.; Middeldorp, C.M.; Lans, R.M. van der (2021)

Article / Letter to editor

Routine outcome measurement (ROM) data offer unique opportunities to study treatment outcomes in clinical practice, and can help to assess the real-world impact of mental health services for children and adolescents (youth). This is illustrated by studies using naturalistic data from specialist child and adolescent mental healthcare services (CAMHS), showing the proportion of patients with reliable improvement, recovery or deterioration (Burgess et al., 2015; Wolpert et al., 2016), and revealing specific subgroups of patients with greater risk of poor outcome (Garralda et al., 2000; Lundh et al., 2013; Murphy et al., 2015; Edbrooke-Childs et al., 2017). Naturalistic data are therefore undeniably necessary in addition to data derived from randomised clinical trials, which often have limited generalisability due to strict selection criteria (Rothwell, 2005; Van Noorden et al., 2014).

• Child psychiatry
• epidemiology
• mental health
• minority issues and cross-cultural psychiatry
• outcome studies

• All authors: Roest, S.L.; Siebelink, B.M.; Ewijk, H. van; Vermeiren, R.R.J.M.; Middeldorp, C.M.; Lans, R.M. van der
• Date: 2021-11-23
• Journal: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
• Volume: 30
• DOI: doi:10.1017/S2045796021000652