Leiden University Scholarly Publications

Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3200594

In Collections

This item can be found in the following collections:

Rosenfield, D; Smits, J.A.J.; Hofmann, S.G.; Mataix-Cols, D.; Fernández de la Cruz, L.; Andersson, E.; ... ; Otto, M.W. (2019)

Changes in Dosing and Dose Timing of D-Cycloserine Explain Its Apparent Declining Efficacy for Augmenting Exposure Therapy for Anxiety-related Disorders: An Individual Participant-data Meta-analysis

Article / Letter to editor
The apparent efficacy of d-cycloserine (DCS) for enhancing exposure treatment for anxiety disorders appears to have declined over the past 14 years. We examined whether variations in how DCS has been administered can account for this “declining effect”. We also investigated the association between DCS administration characteristics and treatment outcome to find optimal dosing parameters. We conducted a secondary analysis of individual participant data obtained from 1047 participants in 21 studies testing the efficacy of DCS-augmented exposure treatments. Different outcome measures in different studies were harmonized to a 0-100 scale. Intent-to-treat analyses showed that, in participants randomized to DCS augmentation (n = 523), fewer DCS doses, later timing of DCS dose, and lower baseline severity appear to account for this decline effect. More DCS doses were related to better outcomes, but this advantage leveled-off at nine doses. Administering DCS more than 60 minutes before...Show moreThe apparent efficacy of d-cycloserine (DCS) for enhancing exposure treatment for anxiety disorders appears to have declined over the past 14 years. We examined whether variations in how DCS has been administered can account for this “declining effect”. We also investigated the association between DCS administration characteristics and treatment outcome to find optimal dosing parameters. We conducted a secondary analysis of individual participant data obtained from 1047 participants in 21 studies testing the efficacy of DCS-augmented exposure treatments. Different outcome measures in different studies were harmonized to a 0-100 scale. Intent-to-treat analyses showed that, in participants randomized to DCS augmentation (n = 523), fewer DCS doses, later timing of DCS dose, and lower baseline severity appear to account for this decline effect. More DCS doses were related to better outcomes, but this advantage leveled-off at nine doses. Administering DCS more than 60 minutes before exposures was also related to better outcomes. These predictors were not significant in the placebo arm (n = 521). Results suggested that optimal DCS administration could increase pre-to-follow-up DCS effect size by 50%. In conclusion, the apparent declining effectiveness of DCS over time may be accounted for by how it has been administered. Optimal DCS administration may substantially improve outcomes.Show less
D-cycloserine
augmentation
exposure
dosing
decline effect
All authors
Rosenfield, D; Smits, J.A.J.; Hofmann, S.G.; Mataix-Cols, D.; Fernández de la Cruz, L.; Andersson, E.; Rück, C.; Monzani, B.; Pérez-Vigil, A.; Frumento, P.; Davis, M.; Kleine, R.A. de; Difede, J.; Dunlop, B.W.; Farrell, L.J.; Geller, D.; Gerardi, M.; Guastella, A.J.; Hendriks, G.J.; Kushner, M.G.; Lee, F.S.; Lenze, E.J.; Levinson, C.A.; McConnell, H.; Jens, Plag; Pollack, M.H.; Resslern, J.K.; Rodebaugh, T.L.; Rothbaum, R.O.; Storch, Eric A.; Andreas, Ströhle; Tart, Candyce D.; Tolinz, D.F.; Minnen, Agnes van; Waters, Allison M.; Weems, Carl F.; Sabine, Wilhelmm; Katarzyna, Wykaj; Margaret, Altemus; Page, Anderson; Judith, Cukor; Claudia, Finck; Geffken, Gary R.; Fabian, Golfels; Goodman, Wayne K.; Gutner, Cassidy A.; Isobel, Heyman; Tanja, Jovanovic; Adam, B. lewin; McNamara, Joseph P.; Murphy, Tanya K.; Seth, Norrholm; Paul, Thuras; Cynthia, Turner; Otto, M.W.
Date
2019
Volume
68
Pages
102149
DOI
doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102149