Leiden University Scholarly Publications

Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3184921

Documents

In Collections

This item can be found in the following collections:

Simma, B.; Walter, S.; Konstantelos, D.; Vonderen, J. van; Pas, A.B. te; Rudiger, M.; Kuster, H. (2020)

Delivery room management of infants with very low birth weight in 3 European countries-the video Apgar study

Article / Letter to editor
Objective To assess delivery room management of infants born preterm at 4 Level III perinatal centers in 3 European countries.Study design This was a prospective, multicenter observational study. Management at birth was video-recorded and evaluated (Interact version 9.6.1; Mangold-International, Arnstorf, Germany). Data were analyzed and compared within and between centers.Results The infants (n = 138) differed significantly with respect to the median (25%, 75%) birth weight (grams) (Center A: 1200 [700, 1550]; Center B: 990 [719, 1240]; Center C: 1174 [835, 1435]; Center D: 1323 [971, 1515] [B vs A, C, D: P < .05]), gestational week (Center A: 28.4 [26.3, 30.0]; Center B: 27.9 [26.7, 29.6]; Center C: 29.3 [26.4, 31.0]; Center D: 30.3 [28.0, 31.9]), Apgar scores, rates of cesarean delivery, and time spent in the delivery room. Management differed significantly for frequency and drying time, rates of electrocardiographic monitoring, suctioning or stimulation, and for fundamental...Show moreObjective To assess delivery room management of infants born preterm at 4 Level III perinatal centers in 3 European countries.Study design This was a prospective, multicenter observational study. Management at birth was video-recorded and evaluated (Interact version 9.6.1; Mangold-International, Arnstorf, Germany). Data were analyzed and compared within and between centers.Results The infants (n = 138) differed significantly with respect to the median (25%, 75%) birth weight (grams) (Center A: 1200 [700, 1550]; Center B: 990 [719, 1240]; Center C: 1174 [835, 1435]; Center D: 1323 [971, 1515] [B vs A, C, D: P < .05]), gestational week (Center A: 28.4 [26.3, 30.0]; Center B: 27.9 [26.7, 29.6]; Center C: 29.3 [26.4, 31.0]; Center D: 30.3 [28.0, 31.9]), Apgar scores, rates of cesarean delivery, and time spent in the delivery room. Management differed significantly for frequency and drying time, rates of electrocardiographic monitoring, suctioning or stimulation, and for fundamental interventions such as time for achieving a reliable peripheral oxygen saturation signal (seconds) (Center A: 97.6 +/- 79.3; Center B: 65.1 +/- 116.2; Center C: 97.1 +/- 67.0; Center D: 114.4 +/- 140.5; B vs A, C, D: P < .001) and time for intubation (seconds) (Center A: 48.7 +/- 4.2; Center B: 49.0 +/- 30.7; Center C: 69.1 +/- 37.9; Center D: 65.1 +/- 23.8; B vs D, P < .025). Mean procedural times did not meet guideline recommendations. The sequence of interventions was similar at all centers.Conclusions The Video Apgar Study showed great variability in and between 4 neonatal centers in Europe. The study also showed it is difficult to adhere to published guidelines for recommended times for important, basic measures such as peripheral oxygen saturation measurements and intubation.Show less
All authors
Simma, B.; Walter, S.; Konstantelos, D.; Vonderen, J. van; Pas, A.B. te; Rudiger, M.; Kuster, H.
Date
2020-07-01
Journal
The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume
222
Pages
106 - 111.e2
DOI
doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.035
Link
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347620303899?via%...