Clinical phenotype and course ofPDE6A-associated retinitis pigmentosa disease, characterized in preparation for a gene supplementation trial

Kuehlewein, L.; Zobor, D.; Andreasson, S.O.; Ayuso, C.; Banfi, S.; Bocquet, B.; ... ; RD-CURE Consortium (2020)

Article / Letter to editor

Importance Treatment trials require sound knowledge on the natural course of disease. Objective To assess clinical features, genetic findings, and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) associated with biallelic sequence variations in thePDE6Agene in preparation for a gene supplementation trial. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study was conducted from January 2001 to December 2019 in a single center (Centre for Ophthalmology of the University of Tubingen, Germany) with patients recruited multinationally from 12 collaborating European tertiary referral centers. Patients with retinitis pigmentosa, sequence variants inPDE6A, and the ability to provide informed consent were included. Exposures Comprehensive ophthalmological examinations; validation of compound heterozygosity and biallelism by familial segregation analysis, allelic cloning, or assessment of next-generation sequencing-read data, where possible. Main Outcomes and Measures Genetic findings and clinical features describing the entire cohort and comparing patients harboring the 2 most common disease-causing variants in a homozygous state (c.304C>A;p.(R102S) and c.998 + 1G>A;p.?). Results Fifty-seven patients (32 female patients [56%]; mean [SD], 40 [14] years) from 44 families were included. All patients completed the study. Thirty patients were homozygous for disease-causing alleles. Twenty-seven patients were heterozygous for 2 differentPDE6Avariants each. The most frequently observed alleles were c.304C>A;p.(R102S), c.998 + 1G>A;p.?, and c.2053G>A;p.(V685M). The mean (SD) best-corrected visual acuity was 0.43 (0.48) logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/50). The median visual field area with object III4e was 660 square degrees (5th and 95th percentiles, 76 and 11019 square degrees; 25th and 75th percentiles, 255 and 3923 square degrees). Dark-adapted and light-adapted full-field electroretinography showed no responses in 88 of 108 eyes (81.5%). Sixty-nine of 108 eyes (62.9%) showed additional findings on optical coherence tomography imaging (eg, cystoid macular edema or macular atrophy). The variant c.998 + 1G>A;p.? led to a more severe phenotype when compared with the variant c.304C>A;p.(R102S). Conclusions and Relevance Seventeen of thePDE6Avariants found in these patients appeared to be novel. Regarding the clinical findings, disease was highly symmetrical between the right and left eyes and visual impairment was mild or moderate in 90% of patients, providing a window of opportunity for gene therapy.Question What are the clinical features and course of retinitis pigmentosa associated with biallelic sequence variations in thePDE6Agene? Findings In this longitudinal cohort study of 57 adults, 17 of thePDE6Avariants appeared to be novel. Disease was highly symmetrical between right and left eyes, and visual impairment was mild or moderate in 90% of patients. Meaning These data suggest thatPDE6A-retinitis pigmentosa may be amenable to gene therapy.In this cohort study, 57 patients with biallelic sequence variations in thePDE6Agene and retinitis pigmentosa were followed up to assess clinical features, genetic findings, and genotype-phenotype correlations of the disease.

• All authors: Kuehlewein, L.; Zobor, D.; Andreasson, S.O.; Ayuso, C.; Banfi, S.; Bocquet, B.; Bernd, A.S.; Biskup, S.; Boon, C.J.F.; Downes, S.M.; Fischer, M.D.; Holz, F.G.; Kellner, U.; Leroy, B.P.; Meunier, I.; Nasser, F.; Rosenberg, T.; Rudolph, G.; Stingl, K.; Thiadens, A.A.H.J.; Wilhelm, B.; Wissinger, B.; Zrenner, E.; Kohl, S.; Weisschuh, N.; RD-CURE Consortium
• Date: 2020-10-15
• Journal: JAMA Ophthalmology
• Volume: 138
• Issue: 12
• Pages: 1241 - 1250
• DOI: doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.4206
• Link: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2771740