Assessing the implementation of pharmacogenomic panel-testing in primary care in the Netherlands utilizing a theoretical framework

Wouden, C.H. van der; Paasman, E.; Teichert, M.; Crone, M.R.; Guchelaar, H.J.; Swen, J.J. (2020)

Article / Letter to editor

Despite overcoming many implementation barriers, pharmacogenomic (PGx) panel-testing is not routine practice in the Netherlands. Therefore, we aim to study pharmacists' perceived enablers and barriers for PGx panel-testing among pharmacists participating in a PGx implementation study. Here, pharmacists identify primary care patients, initiating one of 39 drugs with a Dutch Pharmacogenetic Working Group (DPWG) recommendation and subsequently utilizing the results of a 12 gene PGx panel test to guide dose and drug selection. Pharmacists were invited for a general survey and a semi-structured interview based on the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD) framework, aiming to identify implementation enablers and barriers, if they had managed at least two patients with actionable PGx results. In total, 15 semi-structured interviews were performed before saturation point was reached. Of these, five barrier themes emerged: (1) unclear procedures, (2) undetermined reimbursement for PGx test and consult, (3) insufficient evidence of clinical utility for PGx panel-testing, (4) infrastructure inefficiencies, and (5) HCP PGx knowledge and awareness; and two enabler themes: (1) pharmacist perceived role in delivering PGx, and (2) believed clinical utility of PGx. Despite a strong belief in the beneficial effects of PGx, pharmacists' barriers remain, an these hinder implementation in primary care.

• pharmacogenomics
• implementation
• qualitative
• framework
• pharmacist
• panel-testing

• All authors: Wouden, C.H. van der; Paasman, E.; Teichert, M.; Crone, M.R.; Guchelaar, H.J.; Swen, J.J.
• Date: 2020-03-01
• Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 3
• DOI: doi:10.3390/jcm9030814
• Link: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/3/814