Leiden University Scholarly Publications

Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/121568

In Collections

This item can be found in the following collections:

Speelman, E.S.; Brocx, B.; Wilbers, J.E.; Bie, M.J. de; Ivashchenko, O.; Tank, Y.; Molen, A.J. van der (2019)

The influence of arm positions on abdominal image quality of whole-body computed tomography in trauma: systematic review

Article / Letter to editor
Purpose Whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) is the standard diagnostic method for evaluating polytrauma patients. When patients are unable to elevate their arms, the arms are placed along the body, which affects the image quality negatively. Aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the influence of below the shoulder arm positions on image quality of WBCT. Methods Literature in PubMed and Scopus databases was systematically searched. Results of the papers were stratified into 4 categories: arms elevated, 1 arm up 1 arm down, arms ventrally supported, arms along the body. A qualitative analysis was performed on subjective image quality and a quantitative analysis on objective quality (image noise). Results Eight studies were included with 1421 participants. Various studies reported significantly higher quality scores with arms elevated, compared to arms along the body. Significant differences in objective image quality were found between the arms elevated and the arms ventrally...Show morePurpose Whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) is the standard diagnostic method for evaluating polytrauma patients. When patients are unable to elevate their arms, the arms are placed along the body, which affects the image quality negatively. Aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the influence of below the shoulder arm positions on image quality of WBCT. Methods Literature in PubMed and Scopus databases was systematically searched. Results of the papers were stratified into 4 categories: arms elevated, 1 arm up 1 arm down, arms ventrally supported, arms along the body. A qualitative analysis was performed on subjective image quality and a quantitative analysis on objective quality (image noise). Results Eight studies were included with 1421 participants. Various studies reported significantly higher quality scores with arms elevated, compared to arms along the body. Significant differences in objective image quality were found between the arms elevated and the arms ventrally on support group. The arms ventrally supported group had a significantly higher image quality than the arms along the body group. A statistically significant difference was found in objective image quality between the 1 arm up 1 arm down and arms along the body group. No preferential below the shoulders position could be identified. Conclusion Positioning the arms alongside the body results in a poor image quality. Placing the arms on a pillow ventrally to the chest improves image quality. Interestingly, asymmetrical arm positioning has potential to improve the image quality for patients that are unable to elevate the arms.Show less
Tomography
X-ray computed
Traumatology
Patient positioning
Artifacts
Systematic review
All authors
Speelman, E.S.; Brocx, B.; Wilbers, J.E.; Bie, M.J. de; Ivashchenko, O.; Tank, Y.; Molen, A.J. van der
Date
2019-11-27
Journal
Emergency Radiology
DOI
doi:10.1007/s10140-019-01732-w