Documents
-
- Download
- jmedgenet-2019-106072.full
- Not Applicable (or Unknown)
-
open access
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
Addition of a 161-SNP polygenic risk score to family history-based risk prediction: impact on clinical management in non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families
Background
The currently known breast cancer associated Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) are presently not used to guide clinical management. We explored whether a genetic test that incorporates a SNP-based Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) is clinically meaningful in non-BRCA1/2 high-risk breast cancer families.
Methods
101 non-BRCA1/2 high-risk breast cancer families were included; 323 cases and 262 unaffected female relatives were genotyped. The 161-SNP PRS was calculated and standardised to 327 population controls (sPRS). Association analysis was performed using a Cox-type random effect regression model adjusted by family history. Updated individualised breast cancer lifetime risk scores were derived by combining the BOADICEA breast cancer lifetime risk with the effect of the sPRS.
Results
The mean sPRS for cases and their unaffected relatives was 0.70 (SD=0.9) and 0.53 (SD=0.9), respectively...
Show moreBackground
The currently known breast cancer associated Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) are presently not used to guide clinical management. We explored whether a genetic test that incorporates a SNP-based Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) is clinically meaningful in non-BRCA1/2 high-risk breast cancer families.
Methods
101 non-BRCA1/2 high-risk breast cancer families were included; 323 cases and 262 unaffected female relatives were genotyped. The 161-SNP PRS was calculated and standardised to 327 population controls (sPRS). Association analysis was performed using a Cox-type random effect regression model adjusted by family history. Updated individualised breast cancer lifetime risk scores were derived by combining the BOADICEA breast cancer lifetime risk with the effect of the sPRS.
Results
The mean sPRS for cases and their unaffected relatives was 0.70 (SD=0.9) and 0.53 (SD=0.9), respectively. A significant association was found between sPRS and breast cancer, HR=1.16, 95%CI=1.03-1.28, P=0.026. Addition of the sPRS to risk prediction based on family history alone changed screening recommendations in 11.5%, 14.7%, and 19.8% of the women according to breast screening guidelines from the United States of America (NCCN), United Kingdom (NICE), and the Netherlands (IKNL), respectively.
Conclusion
Our results support the application of the PRS in risk prediction and clinical management of women from genetically unexplained breast cancer families.
Show less- All authors
- Lakeman, I.M.M.; Hilbers, F.S.; Rodriguez-Girondo, M.; Lee, A.; Vreeswijk, M.P.G.; Hollestelle, A.; Seynaeve, C.; Meijers-Heijboer, H.; Oosterwijk, J.C.; Hoogerbrugge, N.; Olah, E.; Vasen, H.F.A.; Asperen, C.J. van; Devilee, P.
- Date
- 2019-06-11
- Journal
- Journal of Medical Genetics
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 581 - 589