Leiden University Scholarly Publications

Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/118618

In Collections

This item can be found in the following collections:

Gijn, W. van; Broek, C.B.M. van den; Mroczkowski, P.; Dziki, A.; Romano, G.; Pavalkis, D.; ... ; Velde, C.J.H. van de (2012)

The EURECCA project: Data items scored by European colorectal cancer audit registries

Article / Letter to editor
AIMS: The EURECCA (European Registration of Cancer Care) consortium is currently formed by nine independently founded national colorectal audit registrations, of which most already run for many years. The cumulative experience of EURECCA's participants could be used to identify a 'core dataset' that covers all important aspects needed for high quality auditing and at the same time lacking needless data items that only consumes administrative effort. The aim of this study is to compare the data items used by the nine registries participating in EURECCA to identify a core dataset and explore options for future research. METHODS: All colorectal outcome registrations participating in the EURECCA project were asked to supply a list with all the data items they score. Items were scored 'present' if they appeared literally in a registration or in case they could be calculated using other items in the same registration. The definition of a 'shared data item' was that at least eight of the...Show moreAIMS: The EURECCA (European Registration of Cancer Care) consortium is currently formed by nine independently founded national colorectal audit registrations, of which most already run for many years. The cumulative experience of EURECCA's participants could be used to identify a 'core dataset' that covers all important aspects needed for high quality auditing and at the same time lacking needless data items that only consumes administrative effort. The aim of this study is to compare the data items used by the nine registries participating in EURECCA to identify a core dataset and explore options for future research. METHODS: All colorectal outcome registrations participating in the EURECCA project were asked to supply a list with all the data items they score. Items were scored 'present' if they appeared literally in a registration or in case they could be calculated using other items in the same registration. The definition of a 'shared data item' was that at least eight of the nine participating registries scored the item. RESULTS: The number of registered data items varied between 254 (Belgium) and 83 (Norway). Among the 45 variables were patient data, data about preoperative staging, surgical treatment, pre- or postoperative radio- and/or chemotherapy, and follow-up. Items about tumour recurrence or quality of life were scored too little to become shared data items. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 45 items were collected by 8 or more of the participating registries and subsequently met the criteria for a shared data item.Show less
All authors
Gijn, W. van; Broek, C.B.M. van den; Mroczkowski, P.; Dziki, A.; Romano, G.; Pavalkis, D.; Wouters, M.W.J.M.; Moller, B.; Wibe, A.; Pahlman, L.; Harling, H.; Smith, J.J.; Penninckx, F.; Ortiz, H.; Valentini, V.; Velde, C.J.H. van de
Date
2012-01-27
DOI
doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2012.01.005