Leiden University Scholarly Publications

Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/109976

In Collections

This item can be found in the following collections:

Fleuren, M.; Dusseldorp, E.; Bergh, S. van den; Vlek, H.; Wildschut, J.; Akker, E. van den; Wijkel, D. (2010)

Implementation of a shared care guideline for back pain: effect on unnecessary referrals

Article / Letter to editor
To determine the effect of the implementation of a shared care guideline for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) on unnecessary early referrals and the duration of the total diagnostic procedure. Introduction of shared care guideline in November 2005. Pre-test in 2005 (April to October), a first post-test in 2006 (April to October) and a second post-test in 2007 (April to October). The introduction of a shared care guideline derived from national guidelines for GPs and several medical/paramedical specialists in two Dutch regions. Three hundred and sixty GPs, 550 physiotherapists and two hospitals (9 neurologists and 18 radiologists) were involved. The essential component of the guideline was a trade-off: if the GP complied with the conservative management approach in the first 6 weeks, the hospital guaranteed a priority appointment with the neurologist after 6 weeks, if still required. The neurologists in both hospitals registered whether a patient had been unnecessarily...Show moreTo determine the effect of the implementation of a shared care guideline for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) on unnecessary early referrals and the duration of the total diagnostic procedure. Introduction of shared care guideline in November 2005. Pre-test in 2005 (April to October), a first post-test in 2006 (April to October) and a second post-test in 2007 (April to October). The introduction of a shared care guideline derived from national guidelines for GPs and several medical/paramedical specialists in two Dutch regions. Three hundred and sixty GPs, 550 physiotherapists and two hospitals (9 neurologists and 18 radiologists) were involved. The essential component of the guideline was a trade-off: if the GP complied with the conservative management approach in the first 6 weeks, the hospital guaranteed a priority appointment with the neurologist after 6 weeks, if still required. The neurologists in both hospitals registered whether a patient had been unnecessarily referred during the first 6 weeks. The duration of the total diagnostic procedure was defined as the number of days between referral by the GP and the consultation when the neurologist made the final diagnosis. The percentage of patients being unnecessarily referred within 6 weeks fell significantly from 15% in 2005 to 9% in 2006 and 8% in 2007. The duration of the total diagnostic procedure also fell significantly in both the long and short terms. The introduction of a shared care guideline for all care providers in a region reduces the number of unnecessary early referrals for patients with LRS.Show less
implementation guideline adherence hospitals primary health care quality of health care sciatica organizations
All authors
Fleuren, M.; Dusseldorp, E.; Bergh, S. van den; Vlek, H.; Wildschut, J.; Akker, E. van den; Wijkel, D.
Date
2010-10-31
Journal
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
415 - 420
DOI
doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzq046