Sparse probabilistic evaluation for treatment planning: a feasibility study in IMPT head and neck patients
Abstract
Objective: Probabilistic evaluation improves the trade-off between target coverage and OAR sparing in IMPT but remains computationally demanding. This study proposes sparse probabilistic evaluation (SPE), a computationally efficient approach integrated into a clinical treatment planning system.
Approach: Clinical plans of 20 IMPT head and neck cancer patients treated in 2024 were included. SPE used a predefined setup and range error grid with Monte Carlo (MC) computed dose distributions. Two grid settings were evaluated: the maximum error E-max (3 sigma or 4 sigma), with sigma = root(sigma(randomerror))(2 )+ (sigma(systematicerror))(2), and the number of setup error points n(setup) (7, 33, 123). Accuracy and duration of SPE with each grid were evaluated in the calibration group (5 patients). A total of 1000 treatments with normally distributed random (sigma = 1 mm) and systematic (sigma = 0.92 mm) setup and range (sigma = 1.5%) errors were simulated. The dose distribution of the nearest error point in the grid was assigned to each fraction. Probability distributions derived from SPE were compared with those from a reference based on 35 000 MC calculations. Agreement was quantified using the mean percentile error (MPE), the mean absolute difference across percentiles 0.01, 0.02, & mldr;, 1. The found optimal grid (E-max = 3 sigma, n(setup) = 33) was applied to the validation group (15 patients).
Main results: The median MPE in the calibration group decreased significantly as the number of error points increased from 7 (t(avg) = 2 min) to 33 (t(avg) = 9 min), with no further improvement between 33 and 123 (t(avg) = 27 min) error points. Increasing E-max from 3 sigma to 4 sigma only improved accuracy for values above the 98th percentile. Applying SPE to the validation group resulted in median errors of 0.02 Gy RBE (range: -0.11-0.07) for the 10th percentile of the D-99.8%,D- CTV distribution and 0.0 Gy RBE (range: -0.14-0.23) for the 95th percentile of the D-0.03cc,D-SpinalCord Core distribution. Significance: SPE achieves sufficient accuracy while requiring clinically acceptable computation times, paving the way for probabilistic evaluation in clinical practice.

