Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4309162
Documents
-
- Download
- Title Pages_Contents
-
open access
-
- Download
- Part I: Chapter 2
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Download
- Part I: Chapter 3
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Download
- Part I: Chapter 4
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Download
- Part I: Chapter 5
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Download
- Part II: Chapter 6
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Download
- Part II: Chapter 7
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Download
- Part II: Chapter 8
-
open access
-
- Download
- List of References
-
open access
-
- Download
- Summary in Dutch
-
open access
-
- Download
- Propositions
-
open access
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
Symptomatic treatment of myasthenia gravis and its role in the era of emerging immunomodulatory treatments
Part I evaluated symptomatic treatment. A literature review highlighted that pyridostigmine remains the cornerstone of symptomatic therapy despite limited high-quality evidence, while the roles of amifampridine, sympathomimetics, and emerging therapies remain uncertain. A cross-sectional study of 410 patients showed that pyridostigmine was widely used and moderately effective but associated with frequent side effects, with 91% of current users reporting at least one adverse effect and 26% discontinuing treatment because of side effects. The randomized, placebo-controlled IMPACT-MG trial demonstrated that pyridostigmine significantly improved disease severity, quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and was highly cost-effective. In contrast, adding amifampridine to pyridostigmine did not improve clinical...Show more This thesis provides an overview of the therapeutic landscape for myasthenia gravis (MG), focusing on symptomatic therapies and immunomodulatory treatments.
Part I evaluated symptomatic treatment. A literature review highlighted that pyridostigmine remains the cornerstone of symptomatic therapy despite limited high-quality evidence, while the roles of amifampridine, sympathomimetics, and emerging therapies remain uncertain. A cross-sectional study of 410 patients showed that pyridostigmine was widely used and moderately effective but associated with frequent side effects, with 91% of current users reporting at least one adverse effect and 26% discontinuing treatment because of side effects. The randomized, placebo-controlled IMPACT-MG trial demonstrated that pyridostigmine significantly improved disease severity, quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and was highly cost-effective. In contrast, adding amifampridine to pyridostigmine did not improve clinical outcomes but increased adverse events.
Part II examined immunomodulatory therapy. Registry data demonstrated persistent long-term use of pyridostigmine and corticosteroids, with substantial use of IVIg and plasma exchange during the disease course. Finally, a retrospective cohort of patients with refractory MG showed that efgartigimod resulted in favorable clinical outcomes in over half of patients and enabled reduction of other MG treatments in 80%, while individualized dosing intervals were commonly adopted in clinical practice.
Show less
- All authors
- Remijn-Nelissen; L.
- Supervisor
- Verschuuren, J.J.G.M.; Gelder, T. van
- Co-supervisor
- Tannemaat; M.R.
- Committee
- Maarel, S.M. van der; Guchelaar, H.J.; Barnett-Tapia, C.; Dekker, A.M.
- Qualification
- Doctor (dr.)
- Awarding Institution
- Faculty of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden University
- Date
- 2026-09-03
- ISBN (print)
- 9789465345413