Towards a quantitative adverse outcome pathway for liver carcinogenesis: from proliferation to prediction

Veltman, C.H.J.; Khalidi, H.; Zgheib, E.; Water, B. van de; Luijten, M.; Pennings, J.L.A.

doi:doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2025.100359

Hazard assessment of non-genotoxic carcinogens could greatly benefit from next generation risk assessment approaches, driven by the multitude of mechanisms through which non-genotoxic carcinogens operate. One method for structuring new approach methodology-derived data is the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept. Currently, mostly qualitative AOPs are described, limiting their application for regulatory decision making. In contrast, quantitative AOPs use mathematical terms to describe the relationships between key events (KEs), allowing for the derivation of a Point of Departure (PoD). Here, we report quantification of the key event relationship (KER) between sustained hepatocyte proliferation and liver tumour formation, two KEs of AOP#220 relating to CYP2E1 activation leading to liver cancer. We use incidence of histopathological lesions indicative of proliferation, as well as BrdU labelling obtained from existing sub-chronic toxicity studies in rats, to quantify proliferation....Show moreHazard assessment of non-genotoxic carcinogens could greatly benefit from next generation risk assessment approaches, driven by the multitude of mechanisms through which non-genotoxic carcinogens operate. One method for structuring new approach methodology-derived data is the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept. Currently, mostly qualitative AOPs are described, limiting their application for regulatory decision making. In contrast, quantitative AOPs use mathematical terms to describe the relationships between key events (KEs), allowing for the derivation of a Point of Departure (PoD). Here, we report quantification of the key event relationship (KER) between sustained hepatocyte proliferation and liver tumour formation, two KEs of AOP#220 relating to CYP2E1 activation leading to liver cancer. We use incidence of histopathological lesions indicative of proliferation, as well as BrdU labelling obtained from existing sub-chronic toxicity studies in rats, to quantify proliferation. For liver cancer, incidences of hepatocellular adenoma and carcinoma from 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies were collected. Data for both KEs were combined to calibrate a response-response model, and Bayesian logistic regression analysis was applied to obtain predictions and credible intervals for carcinogenicity. Proliferative lesion incidence was observed to be a highly specific, yet insensitive predictor, and combining this with BrdU labelling yields more accurate predictions of carcinogenicity. Importantly, we demonstrate that for most of the chemicals tested, inclusion of BrdU labelling returns more precise predicted benchmark dose intervals for PoD derivation. To further explore this quantitative KER and its regulatory application, we propose to include and standardize BrdU labelling for sub-chronic toxicity studies performed for regulatory purposes.
Show less

Leiden University Scholarly Publications

View statistics

Documents

In Collections

Towards a quantitative adverse outcome pathway for liver carcinogenesis: from proliferation to prediction

Funding