Neuro-Cognitive Argumentation and (the Problem of) Other Minds

Abstract

For the last fifteen years (or so) the field of argumentation is becoming more “flexible” and open for new approaches, for approaches that are not based merely on logic (of one form or another), not even just on language. What is not quite clear about these non-verbal approaches to argumentation is how people exchange arguments, how they understand them, and above all, how they negotiate what really is/was an argument?