Strategic Ambiguity vs. Strategic Clarity: The Defense of Taiwan

Hollihan, Thomas A.; Riley, Patricia; Boogaart, Ronny; Garssen, Bart; Jansen, Henrike; Van Leeuwen, Maarten; Pilgram, Roosmaryn; Reuneker, Alex

Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4107811

View statistics

In Collections

This item can be found in the following collections:

Proceedings of the Tenth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation

Hollihan, Thomas A.; Riley, Patricia (2024)

Strategic Ambiguity vs. Strategic Clarity: The Defense of Taiwan

Article / Letter to editor

The United States has long endorsed strategic ambiguity to deter Taiwan from declaring its independence and China from taking Taiwan by force. The United States sells defensive weapons to Taiwan but does not commit to its’ defense. Now there is debate as to whether strategic ambiguity should be replaced by an explicit commitment to defend Taiwan. This paper assesses the arguments in this debate, their appeal to different audiences, and ability to deter conflict.