Ultra-high-resolution CT to detect intracochlear new bone formation after cochlear implantation

Heutink, F.; Klabbers, T.M.; Huinck, W.J.; Lucev, F.; Woude, W.J. van der; Mylanus, E.A.M.; Verbist, B.M. (2022)

Article / Letter to editor

Background: Histopathologic studies reported that cochlear implantation, a well-established means to treat severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, may induce inflammation, fibrosis, and new bone formation (NBF) with possible impact on loss of residual hearing and hearing outcome.Purpose: To assess NBF in vivo after cochlear implantation with ultra-high-spatial-resolution (UHSR) CT and its implication on-long-term residual hearing outcome.Materials and Methods: In a secondary analysis of a prospective single-center cross-sectional study, conducted between December 2016 and January 2018, patients with at least 1 year of cochlear implantation experience underwent temporal bone UHSR CT and residual hearing assessment. Two observers evaluated the presence and location of NBF independently, and tetrachoric correlations were used to assess interobserver reliability. In addition, the scalar location of each electrode was assessed. After consensus agreement, participants were classified into two groups: those with NBF (n = 83) and those without NBF (n = 40). The association between NBF and clinical parameters, including electrode design, surgical approach, and long-term residual hearing loss, was tested using the chi(2) and Student t tests.Results: A total of 123 participants (mean age +/- standard deviation, 63 years +/- 13; 63 women) were enrolled. NBF was found in 83 of the 123 participants (68%) at 466 of 2706 electrode contacts (17%). Most NBFs (428 of 466, 92%) were found around the 10 most basal contacts, with an interobserver agreement of 86% (2297 of 2683 contacts). Associations between electrode types and surgical approaches were significant (58 of 79 participants with NBF and a precurved electrode vs 24 of 43 with NBF and a straight electrode, P =.04; 64 of 88 participants with NBF and a cochleostomy approach vs 18 of 34 with NBF and a round window approach, P =.03). NBF was least often seen in full scala tympani insertions, but there was no significant association between scalar position and NBF (P =.15). Long-term residual hearing loss was significantly larger in the group with NBF compared with the group without NBF (mean, 22.9 dB +/- 14 vs 8.+/- dB 6 18, respectively; P =.04).Conclusion: In vivo detection of new bone formation (NBF) after cochlear implantation is possible by using ultra-high-spatial-resolution CT. Most cochlear implant recipients develop NBF, predominately located at the base of the cochlea. NBF adversely affectslong-term residual hearing preservation. (C) RSNA, 2021

• All authors: Heutink, F.; Klabbers, T.M.; Huinck, W.J.; Lucev, F.; Woude, W.J. van der; Mylanus, E.A.M.; Verbist, B.M.
• Date: 2022-03-01
• Journal: Radiology
• Volume: 302
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 605 - 612
• DOI: doi:10.1148/radiol.211400
• Link: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.211400