Supporting Patients with Cancer after Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

Author(s):
Shuman, A.G.; Aapro, M.S.; Anderson, B.; Arbour, K.; Barata, P.C.; Bardia, A.; Bruera, E.; Chabner, B.A.; Chen, H.; Choy, E.; Conte, P.; Curigliano, G.; Dizon, D.; O'Reilly, E.; Fojo, A.T.; Gelderblom, H.; Graubert, T.A.; Gurtler, J.S.; Hall, E.; Hirsch, F.R.; Idbaih, A.; Ilson, D.H.; Kelley, M.; Vecchia, C. la; Ludwig, H.; Moy, B.; Muss, H.; Opdam, F.; Pentz, R.D.; Posner, M.R.; Ross, J.S.; Sacher, A.; Senan, S.; Celis, E.S.P. de; Tanabe, K.K.; Vermorken, J.B.; Wehrenberg-Klee, E.; Bates, S.E.
Published
2022
Publication type
Other

Abstract

In the context of cancer, whether or not to choose pregnancy termination represents a difficult and multifaceted decision. In this editorial, members of The Oncologist editorial team attempt to contextualize the potential implications of the recent Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organizationfor patients with cancer.

Date issued
2022-08-13
Language
English
Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
hdl
1887/3563468
doi
10.1093/oncolo/oyac165