The third-party liability of international organisations: towards a ‘complete remedy system’ counterbalancing jurisdictional immunity

Abstract

Note: dissertation is under embargo.

Following the establishment of the United Nations, states have increasingly conferred powers on international organisations, thus raising the significance of such organisations in international affairs.

Private parties are increasingly impacted by the actions of international organisations. This underscores the need for a proper understanding of the accountability of such organisations and, more specifically, their responsibility in a legal sense. This dissertation concerns the liability of international organisations towards private parties (excluding the personnel of the organisation).

As a rule, when an international organisation is sued before a domestic court, the former can claim immunity from jurisdiction. Accordingly, the dispute cannot be adjudicated by such a court. That is essential to safeguard the independence of international organisations. At the same time, international organisations often are under a treaty obligation to provide alternative remedies for the settlement of disputes of a ‘private law character’. It is submitted that in discharging that obligation, organisations should adopt a systematic approach in conformity with the rule of law. That is needed both to bolster the jurisdictional immunity of such organisations and to increase their legitimacy. The dissertation sets forth proposals based on such an approach. In doing so, the ultimate purpose of the study is to contribute to enhancing the effectiveness of international organisations.