Longitudinal changes in left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy after myocardial infarction: predictive relevance for cardiac remodeling

Abstract

Background Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiac magnetic resonance (cardiac MR) imaging provides quantification of intracavity left ventricular (LV) flow kinetic energy (KE) parameters in three dimensions. ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients have been shown to have altered intracardiac blood flow compared to controls; however, how 4D flow parameters change over time has not been explored previously. Purpose Measure longitudinal changes in intraventricular flow post-STEMI and ascertain its predictive relevance of long-term cardiac remodeling. Study Type Prospective. Population Thirty-five STEMI patients (M:F = 26:9, aged 56 +/- 9 years). Field Strength/Sequence A 3 T/3D EPI-based, fast field echo (FFE) free-breathing 4D-flow sequence with retrospective cardiac gating. Assessment Serial imaging at 3-7 days (V1), 3-months (V2), and 12-months (V3) post-STEMI, including the following protocol: functional imaging for measuring volumes and 4D-flow for calculating parameters including systolic and peakE-wave LVKE, normalized to end-diastolic volume (iEDV) and stroke volume (iSV). Data were analyzed by H.B. (3 years experience). Patients were categorized into two groups: preserved ejection fraction (pEF, if EF > 50%) and reduced EF (rEF, if EF < 50%). Statistical Tests Independent sample t-tests were used to detect the statistical significance between any two cohorts. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Across the cohort, systolic KEi(sv) was highest at V1 (28.0 +/- 4.4 mu J/mL). Patients with rEF retained significantly higher systolic KEi(sv) than patients with pEF at V2 (18.2 +/- 3.4 mu J/mL vs. 6.9 +/- 0.6 mu J/mL, P < 0.001) and V3 (21.6 +/- 5.1 mu J/mL vs. 7.4 +/- 0.9 mu J/mL, P < 0.001). Patients with pEF had significantly higher peakE-wave KEi(EDV) than rEF patients throughout the study (V1: 25.4 +/- 11.6 mu J/mL vs. 18.1 +/- 9.9 mu J/mL, P < 0.03, V2: 24.0 +/- 10.2 mu J/mL vs. 17.2 +/- 12.2 mu J/mL, P < 0.05, V3: 27.7 +/- 14.8 mu J/mL vs. 15.8 +/- 7.6 mu J/mL, P < 0.04). Data Conclusion Systolic KE increased acutely following MI; in patients with pEF, this decreased over 12 months, while patients with rEF, this remained raised. Compared to patients with pEF, persistently lower peakE-wave KE in rEF patients is suggestive of early and fixed impairment in diastolic function. Evidence Level 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 3