The value of dialysis and conservative care for older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

Abstract

The main objective of this thesis was to determine the value of dialysis and conservative care for older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. To do so, we compared a combination of patient-relevant outcomes and treatment costs in a cohort of older patients (≥70 years old) who chose either dialysis or conservative care after a shared decision-making process. Overall, we observed that older patients who chose dialysis lived longer compared with older patients who chose conservative care. There was, however, little or no significant survival advantage in patients aged ≥80 years old and patients aged ≥70 years old with severe comorbidity who chose dialysis over conservative care, while similar outcomes on quality of life and symptoms were observed between both patient groups, and lower treatment burden and treatment costs were observed in patients who chose conservative care. Therefore, we conclude that conservative care is a viable treatment alternative to dialysis in selected older patients. In clinical practice, conservative care needs to become available and openly discussed as one of the possible treatment pathways for advanced chronic kidney disease in older patients. Moreover, a shift towards a person-centered process of shared decision-making is needed that aims to focus on all that matters to the patient as person, in order to come to a treatment plan that fits best with the patient.

Chronic kidney diseaseOlder adultsDialysisConservative careShared decision makingSurvivalHealth-related quality of lifeValue-based healthcarePerson-centered care