Analogical reasoning and the third layer of the rule of law

Author(s):
Kloosterhuis, H.; Smith, C.E. (0000-0002-2072-2890)
Editor(s):
Garssen, B.; Godden, D.; Mitchell, G.R.; Wagemans, J.H.M.
Published
2019
Publication type
Part of book or chapter of book

Abstract

This article discusses two perspectives on interpretative argumentation and the connection with the two conceptions of the Rule of Law. First, we will sketch the formal position and we will demonstrate how interpretative argumentation is to be analyzed from this perspective. We will then show the consequences of the second perspective, and demonstrate how the richer conception of the Rule of Law is related to a more context sensitive analysis of interpretative argumentation.

legal argumentationanalogical reasoning in lawdeductive reasoning in lawRule of Law
Date issued
2019
Language
English
Publisher
Amsterdam: Sic Sat
Is part of
Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (2019), p. 662-668
ISBN source
9789090316369
hdl
1887/3210238