Patients' preference in migraine

Abstract

This thesis is about migraine. Three elements are discussed. First element is preventive treatment, second element is attack treatment and the third part focuses on medication overuse headache. The preventive treatment of migraine is a valuable intervention in primary care. If preventive treatment is applied, usually only one attempt with one type of medication is performed. A number of considerations hinder GPs to address preventive treatment of migraine. Also several patient-related aspects cause that the GP differ from national guidelines. The decision to start preventive treatment is based on a complex of considerations from the patient. For example, experienced suffering from migraine and interaction with family, colleagues and general practitioner. Interest in preventive therapy increases with increased concerns about migraine symptoms. In attack treatment of migraine, most patients had a clear preference for one of both treatments. Preference correlated only moderately with the commonly used "two-hour pain-free score." Multi-attack, crossover, 'patient preference' studies are well able to detect clinically relevant differences between existing treatments. Overuse of triptans, resulting in chronic headaches is common and causes unnecessary costs. The common thread through this thesis is what patients want in migraine and which interventions they prefer: patients' preference in migraine.